Anthropogenic noise reduces avian feeding efficiency and increases vigilance along an urban-rural gradient regardless of species' tolerances to urbanisation

被引:26
作者
Merrall, Eve S. [1 ]
Evans, Karl L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
animal communication; antimicrobial capacity; antimicrobial defences; innate humoral immunity; sexual selection in females; Sturnus unicolor; PREDATION RISK; TRAFFIC NOISE; BIODIVERSITY; EXPOSURE; BEHAVIOR; ECOLOGY; IMPACT; CITY; FEAR;
D O I
10.1111/jav.02341
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic noise can adversely impact urban bird populations by interfering with vocal communication. Less research has addressed if anthropogenic noise masks the adventitious sounds that birds use to aid predator detection, which may lead to increased vigilance and reduced feeding efficiency. We test this hypothesis using a controlled playback experiment along an urban-rural gradient in Sheffield (UK). We also test the related predictions that anthropogenic noise has the greatest impacts on vigilance and feeding efficiency in rural populations, and on species that are more sensitive to urbanisation. We focus on six passerines, in order from most to least urbanised (based on how urbanisation influences population densities): blue titCyanistes caeruleus, robinErithacus rubeculla, great titParus major, chaffinchFringilla coelebs, coal titPeriparus aterand nuthatchSitta europaea. We used play-back of anthropogenic urban noise and a control treatment at 46 feeding stations located along the urban-rural gradient. We assess impacts on willingness to visit feeders, feeding and vigilance rates. Exposure to anthropogenic noise reduced visit rates to supplementary feeding stations, reduced feeding rates and increased vigilance. Birds at more urban sites exhibit less marked treatment induced reductions in feeding rates, suggesting that urban populations may be partially habituated or adapted to noisy environments. There was no evidence, however, that more urbanised species were less sensitive to the impacts of noise on any response variable. Our results support the adventitious sound masking hypothesis. Urban noise may thus interfere with the ability of birds to detect predators, reducing their willingness to use food rich environments and increase vigilance rates resulting in reduced feeding rates. These adverse impacts may compromise the quality of otherwise suitable foraging habitats in noisy urban areas. They are likely to be widespread as they arise in a range of species including common urban birds.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]   When the birds go unheard: highway noise disrupts information transfer between bird species [J].
Grade, Aaron M. ;
Sieving, Kathryn E. .
BIOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (04)
[22]   Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success [J].
Halfwerk, Wouter ;
Holleman, Leonard J. M. ;
Lessells, C. M. ;
Slabbekoorn, Hans .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 48 (01) :210-219
[23]   Analysis of the relationships between environmental noise and urban morphology [J].
Han, Xiaopeng ;
Huang, Xin ;
Liang, Hong ;
Ma, Song ;
Gong, Jianya .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2018, 233 :755-763
[24]   So much for the city: Urban-rural song variation in a widespread Asiatic songbird [J].
Hill, Samuel D. ;
Aryal, Achyut ;
Pawley, Matthew D. M. ;
Ji, Weihong .
INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2018, 13 (02) :194-205
[25]   Great tits, Parus major, increase vigilance time and reduce feeding effort during peaks of aircraft noise [J].
Ignacio Klett-Mingo, J. ;
Pavon, Ignacio ;
Gil, Diego .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2016, 115 :29-34
[26]   Experimental anthropogenic noise impacts avian parental behaviour, nestling growth and nestling oxidative stress [J].
Injaian, Allison S. ;
Taff, Conor C. ;
Patricelli, Gail L. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 136 :31-39
[27]  
Isaksson C, 2018, FASCINAT LIFE SCI, P235, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-91689-7_13
[28]   Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study [J].
Jarup, Lars ;
Babisch, Wolfgang ;
Houthuijs, Danny ;
Pershagen, Goran ;
Katsouyanni, Klea ;
Cadum, Ennio ;
Dudley, Marie-Louise ;
Savigny, Pauline ;
Seiffert, Ingeburg ;
Swart, Wim ;
Breugelmans, Oscar ;
Bluhm, Gosta ;
Selander, Jenny ;
Haralabidis, Alexandros ;
Dimakopoujou, Konstantina ;
Sourtzi, Panayota ;
Velonakis, Manolis ;
Vigna-Taglianti, Federica .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (03) :329-333
[29]  
Martin G.R., 2017, The sensory ecology of birds, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780199694532.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199694532.001.0001]
[30]  
Maryland SHA, 2018, SOUND BARRIERS GUIDE