Characterization of arterial stenosis using 3D imaging: Comparison between three imaging techniques (MRA, spiral CTA and 3D DSA) and four display methods (MIP, SR, MPVR, VA) in a phantom study

被引:0
作者
Bendib, K [1 ]
Poirier, C [1 ]
Croisille, P [1 ]
Roux, JP [1 ]
Revel, D [1 ]
Amiel, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop L Pradel, Dept Imagerie Diagnost & Therapeut, UMR CNRS 5515, CREATIS, F-69394 Lyon, France
来源
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE | 1999年 / 80卷 / 11期
关键词
image; processing; images; interpretation; angiography; comparative study; arteries; stenosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction. Accurate assessment of arterial stenosis is a major public health issue for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The number of imaging techniques and types of software for display of imaging data is increasing. Few studies that compare these different techniques are available in the literature. Materials and methods. Using phantoms to reproduce the main types of arterial stenosis, the authors compared three 3D acquisition techniques (MRA, CTA, and 30 DSA) and four types of display methods (MIP, SR, MPVR, and VA). The degree, the shape, and the location of different types of stenoses were analyzed by three experienced observers during two successive readings. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were assessed. The results of the various acquisition techniques and display methods also were compared to the digital reference data (CFAO) of the physical phantoms. Results. The degree of intra- and inter-observer reproducibility for the assessment of shape and location of the stenoses was good. Visual assessment of the degree of stenosis showed significant differences between two observers as well as in two readings by one observer. The 3D DSA was the most accurate technique for assessing the degree of stenosis. CTA provided better results than MRA. MPVR provided an accurate assessment of the degree of the stenosis. 3D DSA and CTA assessed stenosis form and localization adequately, with no significant difference; both methods appeared to be more accurate than MRA. SR provided the best information on the eccentric nature of the stenosis. The shape was very well assessed by VA and MPVR. Conclusions. Even though 3D DSA is the most accurate acquisition technique for visualization, the combined use of SR and MPVR appears to be the best compromise to describe the morphology and degree of stenosis. Further improvements in automatic 30 image processing could offer a better understanding and increased possibilities for assessing arterial stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1561 / 1567
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AMIEL M, 1995, REV IM MED, V7, P107
[2]  
AMIEL M, 1996, IMAGERIE ARTERIELLE
[3]  
BENDIB K, 1996, IMAGERIE NON INVASIV
[4]   Rotational digital subtraction carotid angiography: Technique and comparison with static digital subtraction angiography [J].
Bosanac, Z ;
Miller, RJ ;
Jain, M .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 53 (09) :682-687
[5]   Human aorta: Preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets [J].
Davis, CP ;
Ladd, ME ;
Romanowski, BJ ;
Wildermuth, S ;
Knoplioch, JF ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 199 (01) :37-40
[6]   A phantom study: Evaluation of renal artery stenosis using helical CT and 3D reconstructions [J].
Davros, WJ ;
Obuchowski, NA ;
Berman, PM ;
Zeman, RK .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (01) :156-161
[7]   PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF EXTRACRANIAL CAROTID STENOSIS - NIR ANGIOGRAPHY WITH MAXIMUM-INTENSITY PROJECTIONS AND MULTIPLANAR REFORMATION COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
DEMARCO, JK ;
NESBIT, GM ;
WESBEY, GE ;
RICHARDSON, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (05) :1205-1212
[8]  
Dix JE, 1997, AM J NEURORADIOL, V18, P409
[9]   FAST MR-ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE AORTOILIAC ARTERIES AND ARTERIES OF THE LOWER-EXTREMITY - VALUE OF BOLUS-ENHANCED, WHOLE-VOLUME SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE [J].
DOUEK, PC ;
REVEL, D ;
CHAZEL, S ;
FALISE, B ;
VILLARD, J ;
AMIEL, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) :431-437
[10]   DYNAMIC CORONARY STENOSIS [J].
GOULD, KL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1980, 45 (02) :286-292