A simple bedside test for upper extremity impairment after stroke: Validation of the Utrecht Arm/Hand Test

被引:12
作者
Reenen, E. Th. Kruitwagen-Van [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Post, M. W. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mulder-Bouwens, K. [3 ]
Visser-Meily, J. M. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Rehabil, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Inst Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Rehabil Ctr De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Stroke; assessment; motor activity; outcome assessment; arm; rehabilitation; MOTOR-ASSESSMENT SCALE; FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; ARM FUNCTION; RECOVERY; REHABILITATION; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/09638280902846855
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose. To examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability, criterion validity and responsiveness of the Utrecht Arm/hand Test (UAT), a quick and easy assessment method for upper extremity impairment after stroke. Method. Study 1 (N = 29): Repeated administration of the UAT at admission and discharge; comparison with scores on the Fugl-Meyer test (FM), Action Research Arm test (ARA) and Self-Care scale of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Study 2 (N = 192): Admission of the UAT and Frenchay Arm Test at admission (FAT) and discharge. Computation of Spearman correlations between UAT and FAT and comparison of the Effect Size and the Standardised Response Mean of both measures. Results. Study 1: Spearman correlations between UAT and FM were 0.93 at admission and 0.94 at discharge. Correlations with ARA and FIM were also high: 0.90 and 0.76 at admission, and 0.89 and 0.73 at discharge. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were excellent (weighted kappa 0.98-0.99). Study 2: Correlations between UAT and FAT were 0.93 at admission and 0.90 at discharge. The mean UAT score improved from 3.7 at admission up to 4.6 at discharge (p < 0.001). The Effect Size and Standardised Response Mean of the UAT were better than those of the FAT. Conclusion. The UAT is a simple, valid and reliable bedside test for the evaluation of upper extremity impairment after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1343
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: A new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke
    Barreca, SR
    Stratford, PW
    Lambert, CL
    Masters, LM
    Streiner, DL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (08): : 1616 - 1622
  • [2] Broeks JG, 1999, DISABIL REHABIL, V21, P357
  • [3] INVESTIGATION OF A NEW MOTOR-ASSESSMENT SCALE FOR STROKE PATIENTS
    CARR, JH
    SHEPHERD, RB
    NORDHOLM, L
    LYNNE, D
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1985, 65 (02): : 175 - 180
  • [4] USING FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE PROFILES AS AN INDEX OF OUTCOME IN THE REHABILITATION OF BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS
    COOK, L
    SMITH, DS
    TRUMAN, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (04): : 390 - 393
  • [5] Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke
    Croarkin, E
    Danoff, J
    Barnes, C
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2004, 84 (01): : 62 - 74
  • [6] De Souza L H, 1980, Int Rehabil Med, V2, P3
  • [7] MOTOR EVALUATION IN VASCULAR HEMIPLEGIA
    DEMEURISSE, G
    DEMOL, O
    ROBAYE, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1980, 19 (06) : 382 - 389
  • [8] Assessing the Motor Status Score: A scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke
    Ferraro, M
    Demaio, JH
    Krol, J
    Trudell, C
    Rannekleiv, K
    Edelstein, L
    Christos, P
    Aisen, M
    England, J
    Fasoli, S
    Krebs, HI
    Hogan, N
    Volpe, BT
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2002, 16 (03) : 283 - 289
  • [9] FUGLMEYER AR, 1975, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V7, P13
  • [10] The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties
    Gladstone, DJ
    Danells, CJ
    Black, SE
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2002, 16 (03) : 232 - 240