Experimental investigation into the combustion characteristics of a methanol-Diesel heavy duty engine operated in RCCI mode

被引:95
作者
Jia, Zhiqin [1 ]
Denbratt, Ingemar [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Mech & Maritime Sci, Div Combust & Prop Syst, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Dual-fuel; Methanol direct injection; Diesel engine; RCCI; DUAL FUEL ENGINE; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.088
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study examines combustion in a dual-fuel methanol-Diesel heavy duty engine using three different methanol injection configurations: port injection into the intake manifold; direct injection during the intake stroke (DI_E) and direct injection during the compression stroke (DI_L). The latter two methanol direct injection configurations were used in the attempt to reduce HC and CO emissions, which were considerably high in the portinjected high-octane fuel RCCI combustion. Engine experiments were performed using a double Diesel injection strategy with two pilot Diesel injections (PI1 and PI2) and a constant engine speed of 1500 rpm. The effects of three parameters-the PI1 and PI2 injection timings, and the PI2/PI1 duration ratio - were investigated at 5 bar IMEP for the three methanol injection configurations. The onset of unstable combustion and excessive combustion phasing advancement imposed lower or upper limits on the sweeps over the studied parameters. The DI_L configuration achieved lower net indicated thermal efficiencies than the other two methanol injection configurations. The influences of the methanol injection pressure and methanol substitution percentage (MSP) were also investigated for the DI_L configuration at 5 bar IMEP, revealing that the combustion process was relatively insensitive to the methanol injection pressure but was adversely affected by increasing the MSP. Finally, the port and DI_L configurations were tested at various loads. Neither configuration offered any advantage over pure Diesel combustion in terms of net indicated thermal efficiency nor emissions of HC and CO, but both offered lower greenhouse gas emissions at all load points. However, only the methanol port injection configuration achieved ultra-low NOx and soot emissions at 12 bar IMEP.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 753
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   The impact of methanol injecting position on cylinder-to-cylinder variation in a diesel methanol dual fuel engine [J].
Chen, Zhifang ;
Yao, Chunde ;
Yao, Anren ;
Dou, Zhancheng ;
Wang, Bin ;
Wei, Hongyuan ;
Liu, Meijuan ;
Chen, Chao ;
Shi, Junjie .
FUEL, 2017, 191 :150-163
[2]   Vegetable oils as fuels in Diesel engine. Engine performance and emissions [J].
Corsini, A. ;
Marchegiani, A. ;
Rispoli, F. ;
Sciulli, F. ;
Venturini, P. .
69TH CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, ATI 2014, 2015, 81 :942-949
[3]   Effect of Piston Bowl Geometry on Dual Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) in a Light-Duty Engine Operated with Gasoline/Diesel and Methanol/Diesel [J].
Dempsey, Adam B. ;
Walker, N. Ryan ;
Reitz, Rolf .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2013, 6 (01) :78-100
[4]   An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine [J].
Hanson, Reed M. ;
Kokjohn, Sage L. ;
Splitter, Derek A. ;
Reitz, Rolf D. .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2010, 3 (01) :700-716
[5]   Combustion behaviors of a compression-ignition engine fuelled with diesel/methanol blends under various fuel delivery advance angles [J].
Huang, ZH ;
Lu, HB ;
Jiang, DM ;
Ke, Z ;
Bing, L ;
Zhang, JQ ;
Wang, XB .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 95 (03) :331-341
[6]  
Ingle PB, 2011, INT J TECHNOL ENG SY, V2, P81
[7]  
John B., 1988, Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals
[8]  
Karim GA, PROG ENERGY COMBUST, V6, P277
[9]  
Kokjohn S.L., 2012, Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion
[10]  
Krishnan SR, PERFORMANCE HEAT REL