Feasibility RCT of definitive chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy and surgery for oesophageal squamous cell cancer

被引:29
作者
Blazeby, J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Strong, S. [1 ,2 ]
Donovan, J. L. [1 ]
Wilson, C. [1 ]
Hollingworth, W. [1 ]
Crosby, T. [3 ]
Nicklin, J. [2 ]
Falk, S. J. [4 ]
Barham, C. P. [2 ]
Hollowood, A. D. [2 ]
Streets, C. G. [2 ]
Titcomb, D. [2 ]
Krysztopik, R. [2 ,5 ]
Griffin, S. M. [6 ]
Brookes, S. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Social & Community Med, Surg Res Ctr, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Div Surg Head & Neck, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[3] Velindre NHS Trust, Unit 2, Cardiff CF14 2TL, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Hosp Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Haematol & Oncol Ctr, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[5] Royal United Hosp, Bath BA1 3NG, Avon, England
[6] Royal Victoria Infirm, Northern Oesophagogastr Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
oesophageal cancer; surgery; chemoradiotherapy; pilot RCT; qualitative methods; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CHEMORADIATION; RECRUITMENT; CHALLENGES; INTERVENTIONS; MULTICENTER; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2014.313
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment for localised oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is uncertain. We assessed the feasibility of an RCT comparing neoadjuvant treatment and surgery with definitive chemoradiotherapy. Methods: A feasibility RCT in three centres examined incident patients and reasons for ineligibility using multi-disciplinary team meeting records. Eligible patients were offered participation in the RCT with integrated qualitative research involving audio-recorded recruitment appointments and interviews with patients to inform recruitment training for staff. Results: Of 375 patients with oesophageal SCC, 42 (11.2%) were eligible. Reasons for eligibility varied between centres, with significantly differing proportions of patients excluded because of total tumour length (P = 0.002). Analyses of audio-recordings and patient interviews showed that recruiters had challenges articulating the trial design in simple terms, balancing treatment arms and explaining the need for randomisation. Before analyses of the qualitative data and recruiter training no patients were randomised. Following training in one centre 5 of 16 eligible patients were randomised. Conclusions: An RCT of surgical vs non-surgical treatment for SCC of the oesophagus is not feasible in the UK alone because of the low number of incident eligible patients. A trial comparing diverse treatment approaches may be possible with investment to support the recruitment process.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 240
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer
    Allum, William H.
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Griffin, S. Michael
    Cunningham, David
    Jankowski, Janusz A.
    Wong, Rachel
    [J]. GUT, 2011, 60 (11) : 1449 - 1472
  • [3] Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Surgery With or Without Preoperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Bancewicz, John
    Clark, Peter I.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 5062 - 5067
  • [4] Bedenne L, 2007, J CLIN ONCOL, V25, P1160, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7118
  • [5] Surgical research collaboratives in the UK
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    Pinkney, Thomas
    Hall, Nigel J.
    Fitzgerald, J. Edward
    [J]. LANCET, 2013, 382 (9898) : 1091 - 1092
  • [6] Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy
    Blazeby, J. M.
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Titcomb, D. R.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Hollowood, A. D.
    Barham, C. P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (04) : 544 - 551
  • [7] Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial
    Burmeister, BH
    Smithers, BM
    Gebski, V
    Fitzgerald, L
    Simes, RJ
    Devitt, P
    Ackland, S
    Gotley, DC
    Joseph, D
    Millar, J
    North, J
    Walpole, ET
    Denham, JW
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) : 659 - 668
  • [8] Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing standard esophagectomy with chemoradiotherapy for treatment of squamous esophageal cancer: Early results from the Chinese University Research Group for Esophageal Cancer (CURE)
    Chiu, PWY
    Chan, ACW
    Leung, SF
    Leong, HT
    Kwong, KH
    Li, MKW
    Au-Yeung, ACM
    Chung, SCS
    Ng, EKW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (06) : 794 - 802
  • [9] The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2009, 10
  • [10] Chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab in patients with oesophageal cancer (SCOPE1): a multicentre, phase 2/3 randomised trial
    Crosby, Thomas
    Hurt, Christopher N.
    Falk, Stephen
    Gollins, Simon
    Mukherjee, Somnath
    Staffurth, John
    Ray, Ruby
    Bashir, Nadim
    Bridgewater, John A.
    Geh, J. Ian
    Cunningham, David
    Blazeby, Jane
    Roy, Rajarshi
    Maughan, Tim
    Griffiths, Gareth
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (07) : 627 - 637