Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure

被引:115
作者
Pommerening, Arne [1 ]
Stoyan, Dietrich
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Sch Agr & Forest Sci, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] TU Bergakad Freiberg, Inst Stochast, D-09596 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X06-060
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Indices quantifying spatial forest structure are frequently used to monitor spatial aspects of tree attributes including biodiversity in research plots of limited size. The treatment of edge trees, which are close to the plot boundaries, can affect the estimation of such indices that include neighbour effects, since some of their neighbours are likely to fall outside the plot. This paper investigates whether and under what circumstances edge-correction methods are necessary and evaluates the performance of six different approaches: no edge correction, translation, reflection, buffer zone, and two new nearest-neighbour methods. The performance of edge-correction methods depends strongly on the algorithmic structure of the indices and the spatial pattern of tree positions involved. Some edge-correction methods introduce more error than ignoring edge bias altogether. For indices accounting for the diversity of tree positions and especially for those computing angles, translation or buffer zone methods reduce the estimation error regardless of the sample size. The use of the reflection method is associated with large bias values. One of the new nearest-neighbour edge-correction methods proves to be capable of reducing the bias considerably. The results confirm the need for sufficiently large monitoring plots to avoid bias from edge effects. Where this is impossible, neighbours beyond the plot boundary need to be included in the survey, thus providing unbiased estimates but at the cost of extra measurements. Sensitivity analysis is required for newly introduced indices prior to their first application.
引用
收藏
页码:1723 / 1739
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables [J].
Aguirre, O ;
Hui, GY ;
von Gadow, K ;
Jiménez, J .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 183 (1-3) :137-145
[2]   Neighbourhood analysis in the savanna palm Borassus aethiopum:: interplay of intraspecific competition and soil patchiness [J].
Barot, S ;
Gignoux, J .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (01) :79-88
[3]   Asymmetric competition as a natural outcome of neighbour interactions among plants: results from the field-of-neighbourhood modelling approach [J].
Bauer, S ;
Wyszomirski, T ;
Berger, U ;
Hildenbrandt, H ;
Grimm, V .
PLANT ECOLOGY, 2004, 170 (01) :135-145
[4]  
BOLSING S, 1996, THESIS U GOTTINGEN
[5]   DISTANCE TO NEAREST NEIGHBOR AS A MEASURE OF SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS IN POPULATIONS [J].
CLARK, PJ ;
EVANS, FC .
ECOLOGY, 1954, 35 (04) :445-453
[6]  
Diggle P, 2003, STAT ANAL SPATIAL PO
[7]  
Donnelly K, 1978, SIMULATION STUDIES A, P91
[8]  
FULDNER K, 1995, THESIS U GOTTINGEN
[9]  
Gadow K.v., 2002, Proceedings of the IUFRO International workshop 'Sustainable forestry in temperate regions', Lund, Sweden, P20
[10]   Comparing the performances of Diggle's tests of spatial randomness for small samples with and without edge-effect correction: Application to ecological data [J].
Gignoux, J ;
Duby, C ;
Barot, S .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (01) :156-164