The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users

被引:12
作者
Brochier, Tim [1 ,2 ]
McDermott, Hugh J. [1 ,2 ]
Mckay, Colette M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med Bion, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Bion Inst, 384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
CARRIER PULSE-RATE; AMPLITUDE-MODULATION; RECOGNITION; SITE; LISTENERS; PHONEME; CUES;
D O I
10.1121/1.4983658
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In order to improve speech understanding for cochlear implant users, it is important to maximize the transmission of temporal information. The combined effects of stimulation rate and presentation level on temporal information transfer and speech understanding remain unclear. The present study systematically varied presentation level (60, 50, and 40 dBA) and stimulation rate [500 and 2400 pulses per second per electrode (pps)] in order to observe how the effect of rate on speech understanding changes for different presentation levels. Speech recognition in quiet and noise, and acoustic amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured with acoustic stimuli presented to speech processors via direct audio input (DAI). With the 500 pps processor, results showed significantly better performance for consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant words in quiet, and a reduced effect of noise on sentence recognition. However, no rate or level effect was found for AMDTs, perhaps partly because of amplitude compression in the sound processor. AMDTs were found to be strongly correlated with the effect of noise on sentence perception at low levels. These results indicate that AMDTs, at least when measured with the CP910 Freedom speech processor via DAI, explain between-subject variance of speech understanding, but do not explain within-subject variance for different rates and levels. (C) 2017 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:4097 / 4105
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants [J].
Arora, Komal ;
Dawson, Pam ;
Dowell, Richard ;
Vandali, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (08) :561-567
[2]  
Azadpour M., 2015, C IMPL AUD PROSTH
[3]  
Bench J, 1979, Br J Audiol, V13, P108, DOI 10.3109/03005367909078884
[4]   Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels [J].
Chatterjee, M ;
Oba, SI .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (02) :993-1002
[5]   On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks [J].
Dai, Huanping ;
Micheyl, Christophe .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (02) :538-547
[6]   Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users [J].
De Ruiter, Anke M. ;
Debruyne, Joke A. ;
Chenault, Michelene N. ;
Francart, Tom ;
Brokx, Jan P. L. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2015, 36 (05) :557-566
[7]   PHASE-LOCKING OF AUDITORY-NERVE DISCHARGES TO SINUSOIDAL ELECTRIC-STIMULATION OF THE COCHLEA [J].
DYNES, SBC ;
DELGUTTE, B .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 58 (01) :79-90
[8]   Temporal modulation transfer functions in cochlear implantees using a method that limits overall loudness cues [J].
Fraser, Matthew ;
McKay, Colette M. .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 283 (1-2) :59-69
[9]   Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Cruz, RJ .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (03) :169-184
[10]   Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners [J].
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 107 (01) :589-597