Retrospective Study on Immediate Functional Loading of Edentulous Maxillas and Mandibles With 690 Implants, Up to 71 Months of Follow-Up

被引:26
|
作者
Li, William [1 ]
Chow, James [1 ]
Hui, Edward [1 ]
Lee, P. K. M. [1 ]
Chow, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Associated Branemark Osseointegrat Ctr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
BRANEMARK SYSTEM IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; CLINICAL REPORT; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; FLAPLESS SURGERY; FIXED PROSTHESES; TILTED IMPLANTS; MULTICENTER; STABILITY; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to describe immediate functional loading of completely edentulous maxillas and mandibles by fixed provisional prostheses and to compare cumulative survival rates between maxillas and mandibles. Contributing factors including implant diameter, system, configuration, type of abutment connections, position of implants, and insertion torque values were investigated. Patients and Methods: From August 2001 to March 2007, 111 patients treated at the Associated Branemark Osseointegration Center, Hong Kong, who received immediate functional loading of implants by fixed completely edentulous provisional prostheses were reviewed. Marginal bone changes were measured. Results: There were 48 edentulous maxillas and 85 edentulous mandibles, in total 133 arches. Twenty-two cases received simultaneous maxillary and mandibular rehabilitation. Three hundred nineteen implants were used for the maxilla and 371 implants for the mandible, in total 690 implants. A mean of 6.65 fixtures was used to reconstruct an edentulous maxilla and a mean of 4.36 implants for m edentulous mandible. The mean follow-up period was 29.5 months, ranging from 11.5 to 71 months. Six hundred seventy-two of 690 implants (97.4%) had been followed up at least 1 year. Four implants failed in the maxilla and 5 implants failed in the mandible. Mean marginal bone loss was 0.07 mm after I year. Mean failure time was 2.89 months postoperatively (range, 2 to 5 mo). In those failed implants, maximal insertion torque values were significantly lower than those of successful ones. The immediate loading protocol constituted cumulative survival rates of 98.7% for the maxilla and 98.7% for the mandible, with an overall cumulative survival rate of 98.7%. There was no significant difference in survival rates between the maxillas and mandibles (chi(2) exact test, P = 1.000). The implant survival rate was found to be not related to implant diameter, system, configuration, type of abutment connections, and position of implants (P > .05). Conclusion: The immediate loading protocol by fixed provisional prostheses proved to be an effective method in restoring completely edentulous maxillas and mandibles, and the maximal insertion torque value may be a prognostic factor in determining Success. (C) 2009 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:2653-2662, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:2653 / 2662
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years
    Maló P.
    de Araújo Nobre M.
    Lopes A.
    Moss S.
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015, 19 (1) : 19 - 27
  • [42] Retrospective Clinical Study of 453 Novel Tapered Implants Placed in All Bone Types: Survival Rate Analysis Up to 2 Years of Follow-Up
    Thome, Geninho
    Cartelli, Carolina Accorsi
    Vianna, Camila Pereira
    Trojan, Larissa Carvalho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (04) : 757 - 761
  • [43] A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years
    Aparicio, Carlos
    Ouazzani, Wafaa
    Garcia, Roberto
    Arevalo, Xabier
    Muela, Rosa
    Fortes, Vanessa
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, 8 (03) : 114 - 122
  • [44] Immediate vs. delayed loading in the posterior mandible: a split-mouth study with up to 15years of follow-up
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    Aydin, Erhan
    Locher, Kathrin
    Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (02) : E74 - E79
  • [45] Sandwich osteotomy in atrophic mandibles: A retrospective study with a 2-to 144-month follow-up
    Geng, Yuan-ming
    Zhou, Miao
    Parvini, Patricia
    Scarlat, Sebastian
    Naujokat, Hendrik
    Abraha, Sophia Mulugeta
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (10) : 1027 - 1037
  • [46] Immediate Function of Anodically Oxidized Surface Implants (TiUnite™) for Fixed Prosthetic Rehabilitation: Retrospective Study with 10 Years of Follow-Up
    Malo, Paulo
    Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
    Goncalves, Yolande
    Lopes, Armando
    Ferro, Ana
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [47] Somatosensory alterations after single-unit dental implant immediate loading: A 1-year follow-up study
    Herreira-Ferreira, Matheus
    Bonfante, Estevam Augusto
    Conti, Pauloesar Rodrigues
    Araujo-Junior, Everardo Napolea Santana de
    Machado, Camila Moreira
    Alves, Patrick Henry Machado
    Costa, Yuri Martins
    Bonjardim, Leonardo Rigoldi
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 147
  • [48] Immediate Loading of Conical Connection Implants: Up-to-2-Year Retrospective Clinical and Radiologic Study
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Mura, Priamo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (01) : 142 - 152
  • [49] Immediate Implant Placement and Restoration in the Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Study with 18 Months of Follow-up
    Tortamano, Pedro
    Alves Camargo, Luiz Otavio
    Bello-Silva, Marina Stella
    Kanashiro, Lucio Hirokuni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (02) : 345 - 350
  • [50] Implant Stability Measurements in the Long-Term Follow-up of Dentis Implants: A Retrospective Study With Periotest
    Jeong, Mi-Ae
    Jung, Mi-Kyung
    Kim, Su-Gwan
    Oh, Ji-Su
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (03) : 263 - 266