Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings

被引:19
作者
Bernard, Aaron W. [1 ]
Ceccolini, Gabbriel [1 ]
Feinn, Richard [1 ]
Rockfeld, Jennifer [1 ]
Rosenberg, Ilene [1 ]
Thomas, Listy [1 ]
Cassese, Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Frank H Netter MD Sch Med Quinnipiac, Hamden, CT USA
来源
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE | 2017年 / 22卷
关键词
OSCE; feedback; clinical skills; self-assessment; video review SP: Standardized patient; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; EXPERT PERFORMANCE; FEEDBACK; EDUCATION; ACQUISITION; REFLECTION;
D O I
10.1080/10872981.2017.1324718
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Performance feedback is considered essential to clinical skills development. Formative objective structured clinical exams (F-OSCEs) often include immediate feedback by standardized patients. Students can also be provided access to performance metrics including scores, checklists, and video recordings after the F-OSCE to supplement this feedback. How often students choose to review this data and how review impacts future performance has not been documented. Objective: We suspect student review of F-OSCE performance data is variable. We hypothesize that students who review this data have better performance on subsequent F-OSCEs compared to those who do not. We also suspect that frequency of data review can be improved with faculty involvement in the form of student-faculty debriefing meetings. Design: Simulation recording software tracks and time stamps student review of performance data. We investigated a cohort of first-and second-year medical students from the 2015-16 academic year. Basic descriptive statistics were used to characterize frequency of data review and a linear mixed-model analysis was used to determine relationships between data review and future F-OSCE performance. Results: Students reviewed scores (64%), checklists (42%), and videos (28%) in decreasing frequency. Frequency of review of all metric and modalities improved when student-faculty debriefing meetings were conducted (p<.001). Among 92 first-year students, checklist review was associated with an improved performance on subsequent F-OSCEs (p = 0.038) by 1.07 percentage points on a scale of 0-100. Among 86 second year students, no review modality was associated with improved performance on subsequent F-OSCEs. Conclusion: Medical students review F-OSCE checklists and video recordings less than 50% of the time when not prompted. Student-faculty debriefing meetings increased student data reviews. First-year student's review of checklists on F-OSCEs was associated with increases in performance on subsequent F-OSCEs, however this outcome was not observed among second-year students.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The Use of Reflection in Emergency Medicine Education [J].
Bernard, Aaron W. ;
Gorgas, Diane ;
Greenberger, Sarah ;
Jacques, Andrew ;
Khandelwal, Sorabh .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (08) :978-982
[2]   Feedback in the Emergency Medicine Clerkship [J].
Bernard, Aaron W. ;
Kman, Nicholas E. ;
Khandelwal, Sorabh .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (04) :537-542
[3]   Medical students as peer tutors: a systematic review [J].
Burgess, Annette ;
McGregor, Deborah ;
Mellis, Craig .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 14
[4]   FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL MEDICAL-EDUCATION [J].
ENDE, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 250 (06) :777-781
[5]   THE ROLE OF DELIBERATE PRACTICE IN THE ACQUISITION OF EXPERT PERFORMANCE [J].
ERICSSON, KA ;
KRAMPE, RT ;
TESCHROMER, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (03) :363-406
[6]   Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains [J].
Ericsson, KA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) :S70-S81
[7]   Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes [J].
Eva, Kevin W. ;
Armson, Heather ;
Holmboe, Eric ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn ;
Loney, Elaine ;
Mann, Karen ;
Sargeant, Joan .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (01) :15-26
[8]   Web-based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage? [J].
Harrison, Christopher J. ;
Konings, Karen D. ;
Molyneux, Adrian ;
Schuwirth, Lambert W. T. ;
Wass, Valerie ;
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (07) :734-744
[9]   Readiness for self-directed learning: Validation of a new scale with medical students [J].
Hendry, Graham D. ;
Ginns, Paul .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (10) :918-920
[10]   Thinking about thinking: changes in first-year medical students' metacognition and its relation to performance [J].
Hong, Wei Han ;
Vadivelu, Jamunarani ;
Daniel, Esther Gnanamalar Sarojini ;
Sim, Joong Hiong .
MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2015, 20