Who Makes the Choice: Ethical Considerations Regarding Instituting Breastfeeding in a Mother Who Has Compromised Mental Capacity

This case reports an ethical dilemma in which a mother who had recently delivered a baby through cesarean section after sustaining life-threatening injuries in a car accident did not have documented wishes whether she wanted to breastfeed. Her medical condition rendered her temporarily mentally incapacitated and critically ill, and the lactation medicine team was consulted about whether lactation choice should be preserved by pumping. Complicating considerations in this case were (1) lack of family or designated decision-makers available at the time of injury and emergent delivery, (2) lack of prenatal care, and (3) complex social situation, including prior history of illicit substance use, and state removal of other children into foster care. This case raises important ethical considerations regarding breastfeeding decision-making when a mother is incapable of making the decision, and if there is an intrinsic right for an infant to be breastfed in situations where maternal choice to lactate or to formula feed is unknown. Ultimately, the mother chose to discontinue breastfeeding once she was able to voice her own opinion. The issues discussed in this study may be relevant for future cases when providing guidance on the ethical argument to preserve maternal choice when a mother is critically ill and mentally incapacitated.