Preference for Easyhaler® Over Previous Dry Powder Inhalers in Asthma Patients: Results of the DPI PREFER Observational Study

被引:3
|
作者
Javier Alvarez-Gutierrez, Francisco [1 ]
Gomez-Bastero Fernandez, Ana [2 ]
Medina Gallardo, Juan Francisco [1 ]
Campo Sien, Carlos [3 ]
Rytila, Paula [4 ]
Delgado Romero, Julio [5 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Unidad Asma, Av Manuel Siurot S-N, Seville 41013, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Unidad Asma, Seville, Spain
[3] Orion Pharma Iberia, Madrid, Spain
[4] Orion Pharma Corp, Espoo, Finland
[5] Hosp Virgen Macarena, Unidad Gest Clin Alergol, Seville, Spain
来源
关键词
patient satisfaction; adherence; inhaler devices; dry powder inhalers; asthma control; clinical outcomes; ADHERENCE; SATISFACTION; COPD;
D O I
10.2147/PPA.S295710
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study patient preference for and satisfaction with the Easyhaler (R) device and to assess ease of training and use of the inhaler in patients previously treated with a variety of dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Methods: We designed a non-interventional, cross-sectional, single-visit observational study of adult patients with persistent asthma referred to specialized care who had previously been treated with DPI inhalers for at least 3 months. Once clinical baseline data had been checked, patients filled in questionnaires on asthma control (GINA 2019), Feeling of Satisfaction with the Inhaler (FSI-10), and adherence (TAI and Morisky-Green questionnaires). Thereafter, all patients were trained in the use of Easyhaler. We assessed ease of use and satisfaction (FSI-10) with Easyhaler, as well as inhaler device preferences. Results: We recruited 502 patients (mean age, 50.2 +/- 16.2 y; 63.1% female), of whom 485 were evaluable. In response to the main objective of the study, we compared the values of the self-completed adapted FSI-10, to measure satisfaction with the inhaler. A significantly higher score in each item of the questionnaire was recorded for Easyhaler. Overall, 38% of patients showed exclusive preference for Easyhaler (compared with 15% for the previous device) or were evenly matched in 46% of cases. Conclusion: In the present study, Easyhaler achieved better patient ratings in terms of preference and satisfaction than previously used DPI devices. In order to improve asthma adherence strategies, patient preferences and device choice should be taken into account.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 358
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Peak inhalation rates (PIFRs) of COPD patients when using a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and recently introduced dry powder inhalers (DPI)
    Tarsin, W
    Alshowair, RAM
    Corrado, OJ
    Pearson, SB
    Chrystyn, H
    THORAX, 2003, 58 : 73 - 73
  • [32] Peak inspiratory flow in children and adolescents with asthma using dry powder inhalers: a cross-sectional study
    da Silva, Caroline Palacio
    Aretakis Cordeiro, Jean Silva
    Amorim de Britto, Murilo Carlos
    de Matos Bezerra, Patricia Gomes
    de Andrade, Livia Barboza
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, 2021, 47 (03)
  • [33] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Placebo Dry Powder Inhalers: More Patients With COPD Prefer ELLIPTA Compared to HandiHaler-Based on Device-Specific Attributes and Overall Preference
    Collison, Kathryn
    Patel, Pinal
    Preece, Andrew
    Stanford, Richard
    Sharma, Raj
    Feldman, Gregory
    CHEST, 2017, 152 (04) : 801A - 801A
  • [34] Comparative study of the inhalation parameters of COPD patients through NEXThaler® and Ellipta® dry powder inhalers
    Farkas, Arpad
    Horvath, Alpar
    Reti, Izolda
    Ilyes, Norbert
    Havadtoi, Botond
    Kovacs, Tamas
    Santa, Balazs
    Tomisa, Gabor
    Czaun, Peter
    Galffy, Gabriella
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2024, 224
  • [35] Comparative Pulmonary Function and Pharmacokinetics of Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol Xinafoate Delivered by Two Dry Powder Inhalers to Patients with Asthma
    Harrison, Lester I.
    Novak, Christopher C.
    Needham, Michael J.
    Ratner, Paul
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2011, 24 (05) : 245 - 252
  • [36] Comparison of inspiratory flow rates using an innovative dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients with mild severe asthma and severe COPD
    Jones, Spencer
    Gath, Ingolf
    Weuthen, Thomas
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [37] Real-life effectiveness of inhaler device switch from dry powder inhalers to pressurized metred-dose inhalers in patients with asthma treated with ICS/LABA
    Park, Hae-Sim
    Yoon, Dukyong
    Lee, Hyun Young
    Ban, Ga-Young
    Ming, Simon Wan Yau
    Jie, Joanna Ling Zhi
    Carter, Victoria
    Hardjojo, Antony
    Van Boven, Job F. M.
    Price, David B.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2019, 24 (10) : 972 - 979
  • [38] Dry powder inhalers in asthma and COPD: Which factors determine the frequency of handling errors? A study of Aerolizer, Discus, Handihaler and Turbuhaler
    Wieshammer, Siegfried
    Dreyliaupt, Jens
    CHEST, 2007, 132 (04) : 479S - 479S
  • [39] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Dry Powder Inhalers: More Patients With COPD Prefer Ellipta Compared To Diskus Based On Device-Specific Attributes
    Kirby, S. Yun
    Zhu, C. -Q.
    Kerwin, E. M.
    Stanford, R. H.
    Georges, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189
  • [40] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the ELLIPTA and HandiHaler Dry Powder Inhalers in Patients With COPD: Inhaler-Specific Attributes and Overall Patient Preference
    Collison, Kathryn A.
    Patel, Pinal
    Preece, Andrew F.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Sharma, Raj K.
    Feldman, Gregory
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2018, 15 (01) : 46 - 50