Why the new liberalism isn't all that new, and why the old liberalism isn't what we thought it was

被引：1
作者：
Galston, William A. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
来源：
SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY & POLICY | 2007年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1017/S0265052507070124
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码：289 / 305
页数：17
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
DORF MC, 2001, SUPREME COURTS CELL
[2]  
Dworkin Ronald, 1978, Taking Rights Seriously
[3]   A rational basis for affirmative action: A shaky but classical liberal defense [J].
Epstein, RA .
MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW, 2002, 100 (08) :2036-2061
[4]  
EPSTEIN RA, 2004, COERSION VS CONSENT
[5]  
EPSTEIN RA, 1985, TAKINGS PRIVATE PROP, pCH9
[6]  
FRANKFURTER F, 1925, NEW REPUBLIC, V43, P85
[7]  
Madison James, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments
[8]  
MILL JS, 1956, LIBERTY, pCH4
[9]  
Nozick R., 1974, Anarchy, state and utopia
[10]  
PAUL EF, 1987, PROPERTY RIGHTS EMIN, P103
12