Overcoming the process-structure divide in conceptions of Social-Ecological Transformation Assessing the transformative character and impact of change processes

被引:28
作者
Sievers-Glotzbach, Stefanie [1 ]
Tschersich, Julia [1 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Working Grp Econ Commons, Ammerlander Heerstr 114-118, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
关键词
Evaluation principles; Framework; Paradigms; Social-ecological resilience; Social-ecological transformation; Sustainability transitions; GRASS-ROOTS INNOVATIONS; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS; ECONOMICS; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; POLITICS; HISTORY; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106361
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A fundamental transformation towards sustainability in face of complex social-ecological challenges needs to initiate deep changes of those incumbent system structures that support unsustainable trajectories, while at the same time encouraging a diversity of alternative practices. A review of transformation approaches towards sustainability shows that these do not (sufficiently) link processes of change at the micro level to deep leverages of change in wider system structures. Addressing this research gap, we develop a conceptual framework for a social-ecological transformation that connects the macro and the micro level and helps to bridge process-oriented and structural approaches to transformation. At the macro level, the objectives of inter- and intragenerational justice need to be pursued by challenging the central paradigms that constitute unsustainable trajectories. To make the framework concrete and applicable in practice, we propose a preliminary set of evaluation principles for the micro and meso level that reflect these normative objectives and help to measure the transformative character and transformative impact of change processes. The example of the European Organic Breeding Network illustrates the application of the framework. An Ecological Economics research that is reflective of its transformative quality in light of the incumbent paradigms can make important contributions to transformation research.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Abson DJ., 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
  • [2] Towards a conceptualization of power in energy transitions
    Ahlborg, Helene
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2017, 25 : 122 - 141
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Global environment outlook GEO-5: environment for the future we want
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, WORLD SOCIAL SCI REP
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR, DOI [10.1017/CB09780511808678, DOI 10.1017/CB09780511808678]
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, WORLD SOCIAL SCI REP, DOI [10.1787/9789264203419-5, DOI 10.1787/9789264203419-5]
  • [8] [Anonymous], SAATGUT WER SAAT HAT
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2011, Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag fur eine Grosse Transformation: WBGU. Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag fur eine Grosse Transformation
  • [10] The politics of sustainability transitions
    Avelino, Flor
    Grin, John
    Pel, Bonno
    Jhagroe, Shivant
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) : 557 - 567