A comprehensive analysis of continuous epidural analgesia's effect on labor and neonates in maternal hypertensive disorder patients

被引:11
作者
Han, Bin [1 ]
Xu, Mingjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Continuous epidural analgesia; Labor analgesia; Maternal hypertensive disorder; Neonate; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; CESAREAN-SECTION; METAANALYSIS; BUPIVACAINE; SUFENTANIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.preghy.2016.12.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Maternal hypertensive disorder is one of the most common and severe medical complications during pregnancy. Epidural analgesia administration is widely used during labor process. Aim: To evaluate the potential advantage or disadvantage of continuous epidural analgesia's on labor and neonates for maternal hypertensive disorder patients comprehensively. Methods: We have retrospectively analyzed 232 patients who diagnosed as maternal hypertensive disorder in our hospital since 2015. Among which, 126 patients including 28 cases of severe preeclampsia were administrated with continuous epidural analgesia (Analgesia group), the other 106 patients were untreated (Control group). We have compared the maternal age, body weight, gestational weeks, period for the first and second labor stage; the incidence of eclampsia, natural labor, cesarean section, forceps delivery and postpartum hemorrhage between these two groups respectively; furthermore, we recorded patients who received oxytocin and antihypertensive treatment during the delivery progress as well as evaluated the neonate body weight, Apgar score and performed umbilical cord blood gas analysis. Results: Continuous epidural analgesia does not affect the first and second labor stage period Results: (p = 0.36), However, there is a significantly higher demand for oxytocin treatment (36.5% Vs 19.8%, p < 0.01) and a significantly lower requirement for antihypertensive treatment (22.2% Vs 81.1%, p < 0.001) in analgesia group compared to control group. Results: We also notice that the natural delivery ratio in analgesia group is higher than control group and most importantly, continuous epidural analgesia can increase 1 min Apgar score and has no other effect on neonates' body weight, umbilical cord blood gas parameters, 5 min and 10 min Apgar score. Conclusions: Our result based on a large cohort comprehensive analysis indicates that continuous epidural analgesia can benefit both maternal hypertensive disorder patients and neonates without any side effect. (C) 2016 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 38
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Arail Y. C. P., 2007, BRIT J ANAESTH, V100, P78
[2]  
Belinda J., 2010, CARDIOL REV, V18, P178
[3]   Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes [J].
Cambic, C. R. ;
Wong, C. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 105 :I50-I60
[4]  
Conningham F. Gary, 2005, OBSTETRICS
[5]   Epidural anesthesia: Views and outcomes of women in labor in a Nigerian hospital [J].
Fyneface-Ogan, S. ;
Mato, C. N. ;
Anya, S. E. .
ANNALS OF AFRICAN MEDICINE, 2009, 8 (04) :250-256
[6]   Effect of prenatal betamethasone administration on maternal and fetal corticosteroid-binding globulin concentrations [J].
Jeffray, TM ;
Marinoni, E ;
Ramirez, MM ;
Bocking, AD ;
Challis, JRG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (06) :1546-1551
[7]   Closed-loop feedback computer-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a preliminary descriptive study [J].
Kee, W. D. Ngan ;
Tam, Y. H. ;
Khaw, K. S. ;
Ng, F. F. ;
Critchley, L. A. ;
Karmakar, M. K. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (12) :1251-1256
[8]  
Kehl F, 2002, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V30, P698
[9]   Labor analgesia for the parturient with pregnancy-induced hypertension: What does an obstetrician need to know? [J].
Kuczkowski K.M. .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2005, 272 (3) :214-217
[10]   The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review [J].
Leighton, BL ;
Halpern, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (05) :S69-S77