Plant species diversity and management of temperate forage and grazing land ecosystems

被引:203
作者
Sanderson, MA
Skinner, RH
Barker, DJ
Edwards, GR
Tracy, BF
Wedin, DA
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Pasture Syst & Watershed Management Res Unit, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Hort & Crop Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Agr Sci, Anim Sci Sect, Ashford TN25 5AH, Kent, England
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Univ Nebraska, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2004.1132
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
More than a century since Charles Darwin stated that diverse grasslands produce more herbage than monocultures, scientists still debate the relationship between species diversity and ecosystem function. Postulated benefits of diversity in experimental grasslands include greater and more stable primary production along with more efficient nutrient use. These benefits have been extrapolated to forage and grazing land systems with little supporting objective data. Most information on the potential benefits of increased plant diversity comes from studies of synthesized grasslands that have not included domestic grazing animals. We explore this debate relative to the management of temperate forage and grazing lands. Plant species diversity refers to the number of species (richness) and their relative abundance (evenness) within a defined area. Plant relations influence biodiversity responses through positive (e.g., facilitation, N-2 fixation, hydraulic lift) and negative interactions (e.g., competitive exclusion, allelopathy). Early 20th century research on complex mixtures of forage species (limited to grasses and legumes) for pasture indicated equivocal results regarding benefits of species-rich mixtures and typically recommended using the best adapted species in simple grass-legume mixtures. Recent research indicates potential herbage yield benefits from species-rich mixtures for pastures. Limited animal productivity research on species-rich mixtures indicates variable responses and much more research is needed. Grazing land productivity is a primary focus for biodiversity benefits because of the direct economic relevance to producers. However, taking a broader view of the multifunctionality of grazing lands to include environmental and aesthetic benefits to humans reveals a great scope for using biodiversity in grazing land management.
引用
收藏
页码:1132 / 1144
页数:13
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands [J].
Bardgett, RD ;
Shine, A .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (02) :317-321
[2]  
Barker DJ, 2002, P FORAG GR, V11, P222
[3]  
BARKER DJ, 2003, P AM FOR GRASSL C LA, P172
[4]  
BATEMAN GO, 1956, BULL, V382
[5]   COMPETITION BETWEEN PLANT-POPULATIONS WITH DIFFERENT ROOTING DEPTHS .3. FIELD EXPERIMENTS [J].
BERENDSE, F .
OECOLOGIA, 1982, 53 (01) :50-55
[6]   PHYSICAL STRESS AND POSITIVE ASSOCIATIONS AMONG MARSH PLANTS [J].
BERTNESS, MD ;
HACKER, SD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (03) :363-372
[7]   ECOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTORS IN COMPOUNDING FORAGE SEED MIXTURES [J].
BLASER, RE ;
SKRDLA, WH ;
TAYLOR, TH .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, 1952, 4 :179-219
[8]   EFFECTS OF NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT IN DUTCH CHALK GRASSLAND [J].
BOBBINK, R .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1991, 28 (01) :28-41
[9]   The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model [J].
Brooker, RW ;
Callaghan, TV .
OIKOS, 1998, 81 (01) :196-207
[10]  
BROWN BR, 1936, BULL, V208