National Standards and State Variation in Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Forms

被引:17
作者
Hickman, Susan E. [1 ,2 ]
Critser, Rebecca [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Community & Hlth Syst, 600 Barnhill Dr,E419, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ IUPUI, Res Palliat & End Of Life Commun & Training RESPE, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
end-of-life; ethics; law;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2017.0606
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Paradigm is used across the country to document the treatment preferences of seriously ill or frail patients as medical orders. The National POLST Paradigm Task Force maintains consensus-based standards for POLST programs and uses these to determine whether a state POLST program is developing, endorsed, or mature. Objectives: To evaluate state program form adherence to national standards. Design: Document review. Measurements: Forms from endorsed/mature (n=21) and developing (n=23) states were compared with national standards to assess adherence to required and optional form elements. Results: Required elements were present on 84% of endorsed/mature state POLST forms and 73% of the developing state POLST forms. Compliance with required elements in endorsed states ranged from 50% to 100%. Three endorsed/mature states (14%) had forms that met all of the required elements fully and 14 (67%) had forms that met the all of the elements fully or partially. Conclusions: There is variability in adherence to required and optional standards as well as challenges in interpreting and applying existing standards. Although there may be legal and logistical barriers to the existence of a national POLST form, standardization remains an important goal to support patient-centered care.
引用
收藏
页码:978 / 986
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NATL POLST PARADIGM
[2]   Clarity or Confusion? Variability in Uses of "Allow Natural Death" in State POLST Forms [J].
Chen, Dan ;
Azueta, Daidre .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (07) :695-696
[3]   The POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Paradigm to improve end-of-life care: Potential state legal barriers to implementation [J].
Hickman, Susan E. ;
Sabatino, Charles R. ;
Moss, Alvin H. ;
Nester, Jessica Wehrle .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2008, 36 (01) :119-+
[4]   Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Hickman, Susan E. ;
Keevern, Elisabeth ;
Hammes, Bernard J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (02) :341-350
[5]   The Consistency Between Treatments Provided to Nursing Facility Residents and Orders on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Form [J].
Hickman, Susan E. ;
Nelson, Christine A. ;
Moss, Alvin H. ;
Tolle, Susan W. ;
Perrin, Nancy A. ;
Hammes, Bernard J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2011, 59 (11) :2091-2099
[6]   A Comparison of Methods to Communicate Treatment Preferences in Nursing Facilities: Traditional Practices Versus the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Program [J].
Hickman, Susan E. ;
Nelson, Christine A. ;
Perrin, Nancy A. ;
Moss, Alvin H. ;
Hammes, Bernard J. ;
Tolle, Susan W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 (07) :1241-1248
[7]  
Institute of Medicine, 2014, IMPR QUAL HON IND PR
[8]  
Sabatino CharlesP., 2011, IMPROVING ADV ILLNES
[9]  
Teno Joan M, 1993, J Law Med Ethics, V21, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.1993.tb01235.x