Peeling the onion: Analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union

被引:42
作者
Loeschel, Andreas [1 ,3 ]
Pothen, Frank [2 ]
Schymura, Michael [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Munster, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Econ & World Trade IUW, Hannover, Germany
[3] Bihl Wiedemann GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
Environmental and climate economics; Energy intensity; Index decomposition; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; TRADE GOOD; ENVIRONMENT; COUNTRIES; CONSUMPTION; GROWTH; OUTPUT; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2015.09.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
One of the most promising ways of meeting climate policy targets is improving energy efficiency, i.e., reducing the amount of scarce and polluting resources needed to produce a given quantity of output. Relying upon the World Input-Output Database (WIOD), we investigate the decline in energy intensity in the EU27 countries between 1995 and 2009. Changes in energy intensity can be attributed to two different drivers: changes in the industrial composition of an economy and changes in its sectoral energy intensities. We conduct a series of index decomposition analyses (IDA) to isolate the effects exerted by these drivers. We then take the findings from the index decomposition analysis and subject them to panel estimations. The objective is to control for factors that may have shaped the evolution of energy intensity in the European Union. We estimate the changes in energy intensity as well as the changes in (energy-relevant) structural change and in the sectoral energy intensities. Therefore, we are able to reveal the channels through which factors such as economic growth, capital intensity, and energy prices affect energy intensity. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S63 / S75
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Trade and productivity [J].
Alcalá, F ;
Ciccone, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (02) :613-646
[2]   Comparison of energy intensities in European Union countries.: Results of a structural decomposition analysis [J].
Alcántara, V ;
Duarte, R .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (02) :177-189
[3]   Energy decomposition analysis: IEA model versus other methods [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (03) :1426-1432
[4]   Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Mu, A. R. ;
Zhou, P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (05) :1209-1219
[5]   DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION - THE ENERGY INTENSITY APPROACH [J].
ANG, BW .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1994, 16 (03) :163-174
[6]  
Ang BW, 1997, ENERGY J, V18, P59
[7]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[8]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[9]  
Boyd G., 2010, ENERGY J, V8, P77
[10]  
Caselli F, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P679