A simple model of inefficient institutions

被引:82
作者
Acemoglu, Daron
机构
[1] Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
关键词
political economy; institutions; commitment; holdup; social conflict; economic development; taxation; property rights; regulation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00460.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops a simple model of economic and political institutions that lead to poor aggregate economic performance. In the model economy, groups with political power, the elite, choose policies to increase their income and to directly or indirectly transfer resources from the rest of society to themselves. The resulting equilibrium is generally inefficient because of three distinct mechanisms: (1) revenue extraction, (2) factor price manipulation and (3) political consolidation. In particular, the elite may pursue inefficient policies to extract revenue from other groups. They may do so to reduce the demand for factors coming from other groups in the economy, thus indirectly benefiting from changes in factor prices. Finally, they may try to impoverish other groups competing for political power. The elite's preferences over inefficient policies translate into inefficient economic institutions. The notable exception to this general picture emerges when long-term investments are important, thus creating a commitment (holdup) problem, whereby equilibrium taxes and regulations are worse than the elite would like them to be from an ex ante point of view. In this case, economic institutions that provide additional security of property rights to other groups can be useful.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 546
页数:32
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, JA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (04) :1231-1294
[2]   Economic backwardness in political perspective [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Robinson, JA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2006, 100 (01) :115-131
[3]  
Acemoglu D., 2009, EC ORIGINS DICTATORS
[4]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2006, ADV EC THEORY ECONOM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 10037 NBER
[6]  
[Anonymous], LATIN AM FELL BEHIND
[7]  
Beckford GeorgeL., 1972, Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third World
[8]  
Dunn R.S., 1972, Sugar and Slaves: The Rise of the Planter Class in the English West Indies, 1624- 1713
[9]  
ELTIS D, 1995, J ECON HIST, V55, P321
[10]  
Evans Peter., 1995, Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation