The effect of common features on brand choice: Moderating role of attribute importance

被引:39
作者
Chernev, A
机构
[1] Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham
关键词
D O I
10.1086/209485
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, the effect of common features on brand choice and the moderating role of attribute importance are examined. It is argued that when brand attributes differ in importance, common features are likely to enhance consumer preferences for the option with the best value on the most important attribute, thus further polarizing brands' choice shares. In contrast, when attributes are similar in their importance, common features are likely to have an opposite effect, equalizing brands' shares. The data provide support for these propositions.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 311
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Payne J., 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
[12]   PREFERENCES AMONG GAMBLES WITH EQUAL UNDERLYING DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
PAYNE, JW ;
BRAUNSTE.ML .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 87 (01) :13-&
[13]   TASK COMPLEXITY AND CONTINGENT PROCESSING IN DECISION-MAKING - INFORMATION SEARCH AND PROTOCOL ANALYSIS [J].
PAYNE, JW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1976, 16 (02) :366-387
[14]   The distortion of information during decisions [J].
Russo, JE ;
Medvec, VH ;
Meloy, MG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 66 (01) :102-110
[15]  
*SAS I, 1990, SAS STAT US GUIDE VE
[16]   DO CONSUMERS EVALUATE PRODUCTS BY ADDING OR AVERAGING ATTRIBUTE INFORMATION [J].
TROUTMAN, CM ;
SHANTEAU, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1976, 3 (02) :101-106
[17]  
TVERSKY A, 1977, PSYCHOL REV, V84, P327, DOI 10.1037/h0026750
[18]   SUBSTITUTABILITY AND SIMILARITY IN BINARY CHOICES [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
RUSSO, JE .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (01) :1-&
[19]   ELIMINATION BY ASPECTS - THEORY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1972, 79 (04) :281-&
[20]   CONTINGENT WEIGHTING IN JUDGMENT AND CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
SATTATH, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (03) :371-384