Stipends in Highway Design-Build Projects

被引:2
作者
Chaudhary, Niranjan A. [1 ]
Esmaeili, Behzad [2 ]
机构
[1] Traylor Bros Inc, 1420 King St, Alexandria, VA 22314 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Infrastruct Engn, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
COMPENSATION DECISION-MODEL; REQUEST;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000811
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Considering that little guidance exists for determining the appropriate stipend amount in design-build projects, the goal of this study is to benchmark the current practices regarding stipends and determine the relative importance of their impact on project outcomes in highway projects across the United States. Analyzing 125 requests for proposals (RFPs) across 15 states showed that the average stipends provided by DOTs were 0.5% of the total project value. While the actual stipend provided varies significantly among states and even for projects delivered within a state, there was a statistically significant negative correlation between contract value and percent of stipend (-0.483). Furthermore, a Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference between the percent of stipend provided for different groups of contract values. Significantly, this finding implies that the stipend amount should vary for projects with smaller contract values (e.g., less than $20 million). Finally, the results of the questionnaire distributed to state DOTs showed that owners benefit by providing stipends because they increase competition, attract more bidders, enhance proposal quality, and receive a good rate of return on investment (e.g., higher competition resulting in lower project costs). To ensure these benefits, the results of this study encourage providing stipends for proposals related to projects with high complexity and projects with a high level of design effort. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2001, PRIM CONTR 21 CENT
[2]  
Alleman D., 2018, 1802766 TRR TRANSP R
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GUID BOOK DES BUILD
[4]  
Arizona DOT, 2007, DES BUILD PROC ADM G
[5]  
Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, 2015, DES BUILD GUID PROC
[6]  
Bearup W., 2007, P ACI NA PROJECT DEL
[7]   Study of the Relationship between Procurement Duration and Project Performance in Design-Build Projects: Comparison between Water/Wastewater and Transportation Sectors [J].
Bogus, Susan M. ;
Migliaccio, Giovanni C. ;
Jin, Ruoyu .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 29 (04) :382-391
[8]  
Caltrans, 2008, ALT PROC GUID
[9]  
Christensen M. R., 2002, P AM RAILW ENG MAINT, V14
[10]  
Colorado DOT, 2016, DES BUILD MAN