Use of a patient decision aid for prenatal screening for Down syndrome: what do pregnant women say?

被引:16
作者
Portocarrero, Maria Esther Leiva [1 ]
Giguere, Anik M. C. [2 ,3 ]
Lepine, Johanie [1 ]
Garvelink, Mirjam M. [1 ]
Robitaille, Hubert [1 ]
Delanoe, Agathe [1 ]
Levesque, Isabelle [4 ]
Wilson, Brenda J. [5 ]
Rousseau, Francois [6 ,7 ]
Legare, France [1 ,3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] CHU Quebec Res Ctr, Populat Hlth & Practice Changing Res Grp, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] CHU Quebec Res Ctr, Ctr Excellence Vieillissement Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[4] CHU Quebec, Hop St Francois Assise, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Epidemiol & Community Med, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[6] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Mol Biol Med Biochem & Pathol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[7] Hlth Technol Assessment & Evidence Based Lab M, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[8] CHU Quebec Res Ctr, Hop St Francoise Assise, Populat Hlth & Optimal Hlth Practice Res Grp, 10,Rue Espinay D6-730, Quebec City, PQ G1L 3L5, Canada
关键词
Prenatal testing; Trisomy; 21; Down syndrome; Decision aid; Shared decision making; Theoretical domains framework; Implementation; Knowledge translation; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INFORMED DECISION; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCES; BEHAVIOR; NORMS; NEEDS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-017-1273-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Patient decision aids (PtDAs) help people make difficult, values-sensitive decisions. Prenatal screening for assessing the risk of genetic conditions in the fetus is one such decision and patient decision aids are rarely used in this clinical context. We sought to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a patient decision aid for deciding about prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS). Methods: This qualitative study was embedded in a sequential mixed-methods research program whose main aim is to implement shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of prenatal screening for DS in the province of Quebec, Canada. We planned to recruit a purposive sample of 45 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancy consulting for prenatal care at three clinical sites. Participating women watched a video depicting a prenatal care follow-up during which a pregnant woman, her partner and a health professional used a PtDA to decide about prenatal screening for DS. The women were then interviewed about factors that would influence the use of this PtDA using questions based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We performed content analysis of transcribed verbatim interviews. Results: Out of 216 eligible women, 100 agreed to participate (46% response rate) and 46 were interviewed. Regarding the type of health professional responsible for their prenatal care, 19 participants (41%) reported having made a decision about prenatal screening for DS with an obstetrician-gynecologist, 13 (28%) with a midwife, 12 (26%) with a family physician, and two (4%) decided on their own. We identified 54 factors that were mapped onto nine of the 12 TDF domains. The three most frequently-mentioned were: opinion of the pregnant woman's partner (n = 33, 72%), presentation of the PtDA by health professional and a discussion (n = 27, 72%), and not having encountered a PtDA (n = 26, 57%). Conclusion: This study allowed us to identify factors influencing pregnant women's use of a PtDA for prenatal screening for DS. Use of a PtDA by health professionals and patients is one step in providing the needed decision support and our study results will allow us to design an effective implementation strategy for PtDAs for prenatal screening for DS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ATTITUDE AMBIVALENCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], BILAN DEMOGRAPHIQUE
[3]   Pregnant women's experiences, needs, and preferences regarding information about malformations detected by ultrasound scan [J].
Asplin, Nina ;
Wessel, Hans ;
Marions, Lena ;
Ohman, Susanne Georgsson .
SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 3 (02) :73-78
[4]   Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? [J].
Barbour, RS .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7294) :1115-1117
[5]   Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome [J].
Bekker, HL ;
Hewison, J ;
Thornton, JG .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) :323-329
[6]   Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: A meta-analytic integration [J].
Borsari, B ;
Carey, KB .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2003, 64 (03) :331-341
[7]   Knowledge creation: synthesis, tools and products [J].
Brouwers, Melissa ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
O'Connor, Annette .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (02) :E68-E72
[8]   SATISFACTION WITH CARE IN LABOR AND BIRTH - A SURVEY OF 790 AUSTRALIAN WOMEN [J].
BROWN, S ;
LUMLEY, J .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1994, 21 (01) :4-13
[9]   The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey: An Overview of Findings [J].
Chalmers, Beverley ;
Dzakpasu, Susie ;
Heaman, Maureen ;
Kaczorowski, Janusz .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2008, 30 (03) :217-228
[10]   Can Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer Make an Informed Decision for Mastectomy? [J].
Collins, E. Dale ;
Moore, Caroline P. ;
Clay, Kate F. ;
Kearing, Stephen A. ;
O'Connor, Annette M. ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary A. ;
Barth, Richard J. ;
Sepucha, Karen R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (04) :519-525