Hybrid machine learning forecasting of solar radiation values

被引:83
作者
Gala, Yvonne [1 ]
Fernandez, Angela [1 ]
Diaz, Julia [2 ]
Dorronsoro, Jose R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ingn Informat, EPS, UAM Cantoblanco, C Francisco Tomas & Valiente 11,Edificio B,4 Plan, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
[2] Inst Ingn Conocimiento, Madrid 28049, Spain
关键词
Solar radiation; Support Vector Regression; Gradient Boosting; Random Forests; Numerical Weather Prediction; PARAMETERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2015.02.078
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The constant expansion of solar energy has made the accurate forecasting of radiation an important issue. In this work we apply Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gradient Boosted Regression (GBR), Random Forest Regression (RFR) as well as a hybrid method to combine them to downscale and improve 3-h accumulated radiation forecasts provided by Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) systems for seven locations in Spain. We use either direct 3-h aggregated radiation forecasts or we build first global accumulated daily predictions and disaggregate them into 3-h values, with both approaches out-performing the base NWP forecasts. We also show how to disaggregate the 3-h forecasts into hourly values using interpolation based on clear sky (CS) theoretical and experimental radiation models, with the disaggregated forecasts again being better than the base NWP ones and where empirical CS interpolation yields the best results. Besides providing ample background on a problem that offers many opportunities to the Machine Learning (ML) community, our study shows that ML methods or, more generally, hybrid artificial intelligence systems are quite effective and, hence, relevant for solar radiation prediction. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 59
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Analysis of different comparison parameters applied to solar radiation data from satellite and German radiometric stations [J].
Espinar, Bella ;
Ramirez, Lourdes ;
Drews, Anja ;
Beyer, Hans Georg ;
Zarzalejo, Luis F. ;
Polo, Jesus ;
Martin, Luis .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2009, 83 (01) :118-125
[12]   Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine [J].
Friedman, JH .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) :1189-1232
[13]  
Guarnieri R., 2008, SOLAR RAD FORECASTIN, V1, P1
[14]  
Hastie T, 2009, The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, V2
[15]   Solar illumination and estimating daylight availability of global solar irradiance [J].
Kandilli, C. ;
Ulgen, K. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2008, 30 (12) :1127-1140
[16]   REVISED OPTICAL AIR-MASS TABLES AND APPROXIMATION FORMULA [J].
KASTEN, F ;
YOUNG, AT .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1989, 28 (22) :4735-4738
[17]  
Kleissl J, 2013, SOLAR ENERGY FORECASTING AND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, P1
[18]   Tuning SVM parameters by using a hybrid CLPSO-BFGS algorithm [J].
Li, Shutao ;
Tan, Mingkui .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2010, 73 (10-12) :2089-2096
[19]  
Lorenz Elke., 2009, 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, 21-25 September 2009, Hamburg, Germany, P4199, DOI [10.4229/24thEUPVSEC2009-5BV.2.50, DOI 10.4229/24THEUPVSEC2009-5BV.2.50]
[20]   Evaluation of numerical weather prediction for intra-day solar forecasting in the continental United States [J].
Mathiesen, Patrick ;
Kleissl, Jan .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2011, 85 (05) :967-977