Multichannel CT: Evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware

被引:62
作者
Douglas-Akinwande, Annette C. [1 ]
Buckwalter, Kenneth A. [1 ]
Rydberg, Jonas [1 ]
Rankin, James L. [1 ]
Choplin, Robert H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Univ Hosp 0279, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/rg.26si065512
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Evaluating the spine in patients with metal orthopedic hardware is challenging. Although the effectiveness of conventional computed tomography (CT) can be limited by severe beam-hardening artifacts, the evolution of multichannel CT in recent years has made available new techniques that can help minimize these artifacts. Multichannel CT allows faster scanning times, resulting in reduced motion artifacts; thinner sections, with which it is possible to create a scanned volume of isotropic voxels with equivalent image resolution in all planes; and the generation of a higher x-ray tube current, which may result in better penetration of metal hardware and reduction of artifacts. Although 140 kVp and high milliamperage-second exposure are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. The acquisition of multiplanar reformatted images in the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes and of three-dimensional volume-rendered images optimizes image interpretation. Wide window settings are best for reviewing images when hardware is present. The integrity of hardware is best assessed with multiplanar average intensity projection. Soft-tissue structures are best visualized by interactively varying the window width and level settings. Implementation of these techniques can yield diagnostic-quality images and aid in patient treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:S97 / U107
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Informatics in radiology (infoRAD) -: Introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with multidetector CT [J].
Dalrymple, NC ;
Prasad, SR ;
Freckleton, MW ;
Chintapalli, KN .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2005, 25 (05) :1409-1428
[2]  
EBRAHEIM NA, 1990, ORTHOPEDICS, V13, P1357
[3]   The failed back surgery syndrome - Reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: A report of 182 operative treatments [J].
Fritsch, EW ;
Heisel, J ;
Rupp, S .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (05) :626-633
[4]   CT SCANS THROUGH METAL SCANNING TECHNIQUE VERSUS HARDWARE COMPOSITION [J].
HARAMATI, N ;
STARON, RB ;
MAZELSPERLING, K ;
FREEMAN, K ;
NICKOLOFF, EL ;
BARAX, C ;
FELDMAN, F .
COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 1994, 18 (06) :429-434
[5]   Multi-slice helical CT: Scan and reconstruction [J].
Hu, H .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) :5-18
[6]  
MALL JC, 1983, MODERN NEURORADIOLOG, V1, P187
[7]  
Neyman Edward G, 2002, Crit Rev Comput Tomogr, V43, P419
[8]   Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: Musculoskeletal applications [J].
Pretorius, ES ;
Fishman, EK .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (05) :1143-1160
[9]  
Robertson D D, 1989, J Arthroplasty, V4, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80024-5
[10]   EVALUATION OF CT TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING ARTIFACTS IN THE PRESENCE OF METALLIC ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS [J].
ROBERTSON, DD ;
WEISS, PJ ;
FISHMAN, EK ;
MAGID, D ;
WALKER, PS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1988, 12 (02) :236-241