Effects of face masks on acoustic analysis and speech perception: Implications for peri-pandemic protocols

被引:118
作者
Magee, Michelle [1 ,2 ]
Lewis, Courtney [1 ,2 ]
Noffs, Gustavo [1 ]
Reece, Hannah [1 ]
Chan, Jess C. S. [1 ]
Zaga, Charissa J. [1 ]
Paynter, Camille [1 ]
Birchall, Olga [1 ]
Azocar, Sandra Rojas [1 ]
Ediriweera, Angela [1 ]
Kenyon, Katherine [1 ]
Caverle, Marja W. [1 ]
Schultz, Benjamin G. [1 ]
Vogel, Adam P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Neurosci Speech, 550 Swanston St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Redenlab, 669-585 Little Collins St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SARS-COV-2;
D O I
10.1121/10.0002873
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Wearing face masks (alongside physical distancing) provides some protection against infection from COVID-19. Face masks can also change how people communicate and subsequently affect speech signal quality. This study investigated how three common face mask types (N95, surgical, and cloth) affected acoustic analysis of speech and perceived intelligibility in healthy subjects. Acoustic measures of timing, frequency, perturbation, and power spectral density were measured. Speech intelligibility and word and sentence accuracy were also examined using the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Mask type impacted the power distribution in frequencies above 3kHz for the N95 mask, and above 5kHz in surgical and cloth masks. Measures of timing and spectral tilt mainly differed with N95 mask use. Cepstral and harmonics to noise ratios remained unchanged across mask type. No differences were observed across conditions for word or sentence intelligibility measures; however, accuracy of word and sentence translations were affected by all masks. Data presented in this study show that face masks change the speech signal, but some specific acoustic features remain largely unaffected (e.g., measures of voice quality) irrespective of mask type. Outcomes have bearing on how future speech studies are run when personal protective equipment is worn.
引用
收藏
页码:3562 / 3568
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, A language and environment for statistical computing
  • [2] Aerosol emission and superemission during human speech increase with voice loudness
    Asadi, Sima
    Wexler, Anthony S.
    Cappa, Christopher D.
    Barreda, Santiago
    Bouvier, Nicole M.
    Ristenpart, William D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [3] Face coverings and mask to minimise droplet dispersion and aerosolisation: a video case study
    Bahl, Prateek
    Bhattacharjee, Shovon
    de Silva, Charitha
    Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
    Doolan, Con
    MacIntyre, C. Raina
    [J]. THORAX, 2020, 75 (11) : 1024 - 1025
  • [4] Boersma P., 2001, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, V5, P341, DOI DOI 10.1097/AUD.0B013E31821473F7
  • [5] CDC, 2020, US MASKS HELP SLOW S
  • [6] Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chu, Derek K.
    Akl, Elie A.
    Duda, Stephanie
    Solo, Karla
    Yaacoub, Sally
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10242) : 1973 - 1987
  • [7] Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals
    Corey, Ryan M.
    Jones, Uriah
    Singer, Andrew C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 148 (04) : 2371 - 2375
  • [8] Goldin A, 2020, Hearing Review, V27, P8
  • [9] Hampton T., 2020, AUTHOREA PREPR, DOI [10.22541/au.159050338.83886289, DOI 10.22541/AU.159050338.83886289]
  • [10] Face Masks and Respirators in the Fight Against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Current Materials, Advances and Future Perspectives
    O'Dowd, Kris
    Nair, Keerthi M.
    Forouzandeh, Parnia
    Mathew, Snehamol
    Grant, Jamie
    Moran, Ruth
    Bartlett, John
    Bird, Jerry
    Pillai, Suresh C.
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (15)