Website quality in digital media: literature review on general evaluation methods and indicators and reliability attributes

被引:12
作者
Morales-Vargas, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Pedraza-Jimenez, Rafael [1 ]
Codina, Lluis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Chile, Santiago, Chile
来源
REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL | 2022年 / 80卷
关键词
Website quality; digital media; websites; evaluation methods; reliability; trustfulness; misinformation; ONLINE JOURNALISM; WEB SITES; HEURISTIC EVALUATION; USER-EXPERIENCE; USABILITY; MULTIMEDIA; NEWSPAPERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.4185/RLCS-2022-1515
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Introduction: In the context of the loss of confidence towards Internet content, misinformation, fake news and the financial crisis affecting the press globally, the studies that propose instruments dedicated to evaluating digital media websites are reviewed. Objectives: Identify and characterize the works focused on digital media, examine their methodologies and indicators, and check if they consider reliability attributes among them. Methodology: Scientific production on web quality is examined through a systematic review on 83 articles retrieved from the main databases, detecting parameters of web quality in general, and mentions of web aspects with ethical or social implications. Results and discussion: As part of the findings, it has been found that specific tools for the evaluation of digital media are scarce and that among the evaluation methods, expert analysis through heuristic inspection predominates over user studies. The most studied parameter is interactivity, understood as a space for participation, followed by usability, accessibility and personalization, among others. In addition, there are very few references to deontological matters and almost no references to international guidelines, standards and policies. Conclusions: Numerous studies address specific indicators of digital media, but there are few analysis protocols for websites that support them. There is, therefore, a wide margin of improvement in the studies of website quality in digital media, incorporating not only technical issues but also considering parameters of journalistic rigor and informative credibility.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 63
页数:25
相关论文
共 119 条
[41]  
Hernandez Soriano F., 2013, HIST COMUN SOC, V18, P15, DOI [10.5209/rev_HICS.2013.v18.44222, DOI 10.5209/REV_HICS.2013.V18.44222]
[42]  
Hernandez Soriano F., 2015, THESIS U LLEIDA
[43]  
Hernandez Soriano F., 2014, HIST COMUN SOC, V19, DOI [10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.44942, DOI 10.5209/REV_HICS.2014.V19.44942]
[44]  
Iglesias-Garcia M., 2012, HIPERTEXTNET REV ACA, V10, P20
[45]  
Internet Live Stats, 2021, INT US SOC MED STAT
[46]  
ISO, 2018, 9241112018 ISO, P32
[47]  
Jimenez Iglesias L., 2018, THESIS U BARCELONA
[48]   Evaluating Iranian newspapers' web sites using correspondence analysis [J].
Jowkar, Abdolrasoul ;
Didegah, Fereshteh .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2010, 28 (01) :119-130
[49]  
Krug S., 2014, Don't Make Me Think, Revisited: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability
[50]   Commenting on the News: Explaining the degree and quality of user comments on news websites [J].
Ksiazek, Thomas B. .
JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2018, 19 (05) :650-673