Protected areas, household environmental incomes and well-being in the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem

被引:30
作者
Jiao, Xi [1 ]
Walelign, Solomon Zena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt [1 ]
Smith-Hall, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Global Dev Sect, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Fac Social & Educ Sci, Dept Geog, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Gondar, Coll Business & Econ, Sch Econ, Gondar, Ethiopia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Household income; Environmental reliance; Human well-being; Conservation; Africa; LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES; FOREST DEPENDENCE; CONSERVATION AREA; WESTERN SERENGETI; RURAL HOUSEHOLDS; SERVICES; POVERTY; VULNERABILITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101948
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Protected areas are an important cornerstone in the attempt to halt habitat and species losses. While it is widely recognized that local communities impact on conservation outcomes, there is a limited understanding of the economic importance of environmental resources in protected areas to local household incomes and well-being. This inhibits the development and implementation of efficient conservation policies. This paper, using the iconic case of the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem and its surrounding local communities in Tanzania and Kenya, quantifies the household-level economic importance of this protected area. Data was collected using well-being and environmentally augmented structured household surveys administered to 985 randomly selected households in 25 communities. Results documented high reliance on environmental income of the poorest, a negative relationship between environmental reliance and well-being, with households closer to the protected area having higher environmental reliance and lower well-being. Hence, degradation of protected area habitats will negatively and disproportionately affect the income and may further reduce the well-being of the poorest households. Sustainable protected area management must address human well-being as well as conservation objectives. Increasing access to education and building skills to promote alternative non-environmental based livelihood activities will promote both conservation and development objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Angelsen A., 2011, Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence:methods for research and fieldwork
[2]   Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis [J].
Angelsen, Arild ;
Jagger, Pamela ;
Babigumira, Ronnie ;
Belcher, Brian ;
Hogarth, Nicholas J. ;
Bauch, Simone ;
Boerner, Jan ;
Smith-Hall, Carsten ;
Wunder, Sven .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 64 :S12-S28
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[4]  
[Anonymous], PEN PROT QUEST VERS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being
[6]   Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia [J].
Babulo, Bedru ;
Muys, Bart ;
Nega, Fredu ;
Tollens, Eric ;
Nyssen, Jan ;
Deckers, Jozef ;
Mathijs, Erik .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 98 (02) :147-155
[7]   The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia [J].
Babulo, Bedru ;
Muys, Bart ;
Nega, Fredu ;
Tollens, Eric ;
Nyssen, Jan ;
Deckers, Jozef ;
Mathijs, Erik .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (02) :109-117
[8]   Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions [J].
Baum, Christopher F. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) :299-303
[9]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2
[10]  
Butler CD, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11