Protected areas, household environmental incomes and well-being in the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem

被引:27
作者
Jiao, Xi [1 ]
Walelign, Solomon Zena [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt [1 ]
Smith-Hall, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Global Dev Sect, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Fac Social & Educ Sci, Dept Geog, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Gondar, Coll Business & Econ, Sch Econ, Gondar, Ethiopia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Household income; Environmental reliance; Human well-being; Conservation; Africa; LIVELIHOOD STRATEGIES; FOREST DEPENDENCE; CONSERVATION AREA; WESTERN SERENGETI; RURAL HOUSEHOLDS; SERVICES; POVERTY; VULNERABILITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101948
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Protected areas are an important cornerstone in the attempt to halt habitat and species losses. While it is widely recognized that local communities impact on conservation outcomes, there is a limited understanding of the economic importance of environmental resources in protected areas to local household incomes and well-being. This inhibits the development and implementation of efficient conservation policies. This paper, using the iconic case of the Greater Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem and its surrounding local communities in Tanzania and Kenya, quantifies the household-level economic importance of this protected area. Data was collected using well-being and environmentally augmented structured household surveys administered to 985 randomly selected households in 25 communities. Results documented high reliance on environmental income of the poorest, a negative relationship between environmental reliance and well-being, with households closer to the protected area having higher environmental reliance and lower well-being. Hence, degradation of protected area habitats will negatively and disproportionately affect the income and may further reduce the well-being of the poorest households. Sustainable protected area management must address human well-being as well as conservation objectives. Increasing access to education and building skills to promote alternative non-environmental based livelihood activities will promote both conservation and development objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Angelsen A., 2011, Measuring livelihoods and environmental dependence:methods for research and fieldwork
  • [2] Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
    Angelsen, Arild
    Jagger, Pamela
    Babigumira, Ronnie
    Belcher, Brian
    Hogarth, Nicholas J.
    Bauch, Simone
    Boerner, Jan
    Smith-Hall, Carsten
    Wunder, Sven
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 64 : S12 - S28
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
  • [4] [Anonymous], PEN PROT QUEST VERS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being
  • [6] Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia
    Babulo, Bedru
    Muys, Bart
    Nega, Fredu
    Tollens, Eric
    Nyssen, Jan
    Deckers, Jozef
    Mathijs, Erik
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 98 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [7] The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia
    Babulo, Bedru
    Muys, Bart
    Nega, Fredu
    Tollens, Eric
    Nyssen, Jan
    Deckers, Jozef
    Mathijs, Erik
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 11 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [8] Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions
    Baum, Christopher F.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) : 299 - 303
  • [9] Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2
  • [10] Butler CD, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11