WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives

被引:45
作者
Schlote, A. [2 ,3 ]
Richter, M. [2 ,3 ]
Wunderlich, M. T. [2 ]
Poppendick, U. [4 ]
Moeller, C. [4 ]
Schwelm, K. [5 ]
Wallesch, C. W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Neurol Hosp, D-79215 Elzach, Germany
[2] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Neurol, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Inst Neurol Neurosurg Rehab Res, Magdeburg, Germany
[4] Brunswick City Hosp, Dept Neurol & Psychiat, Braunschweig, Germany
[5] Ctr Neurol Rehab, Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
Stroke; WHODAS II; inter-rater-reliability; ICF; ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE-II; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH; DISABILITY; AGREEMENT; RELIABILITY; CAREGIVERS; SCALE; TERM;
D O I
10.1080/09638280802355262
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose. The present study aimed to measure the internal consistency, inter-rater-reliability and validity of the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) for its application to stroke patients and their closest others. Method. Patients were assessed 6 months and 1 year after stroke with the self- and proxy-rating versions of the WHODAS II. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as well as patients' statements about 'Recovery' and 'Independence' were used as measurements for validity. Patients' statements concerning individual restrictions and limitations were compared with the WHODAS II items. Results. Internal consistency can be regarded as good to excellent, inter-rater-reliability as satisfactory to good. Item reliability ranged from insufficient to good, the percentage of agreements was below 80%. WHODAS 11 scale scores of patients with an mRS score of 0 as well as of recovered and independent patients differed significantly from others. Correlation coefficients between WHODAS II Scales and validation measures ranged from fair to high. Correspondence between stroke related problems and WHODAS II items was good. Conclusion. The WHODAS II is a valid, generally reliable and useful instrument for the assessment of stroke patients over the first year after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 864
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT CLASS FUNCT DIS
[2]   Validity and reliability of simple questions in assessing short- and long-term outcome in Norwegian stroke patients [J].
Berge, E ;
Fjærtoft, H ;
Indredavik, B ;
Sandset, PM .
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2001, 11 (04) :305-310
[3]   MEASUREMENTS OF ACUTE CEREBRAL INFARCTION - A CLINICAL EXAMINATION SCALE [J].
BROTT, T ;
ADAMS, HP ;
OLINGER, CP ;
MARLER, JR ;
BARSAN, WG ;
BILLER, J ;
SPILKER, J ;
HOLLERAN, R ;
EBERLE, R ;
HERTZBERG, V ;
RORICK, M ;
MOOMAW, CJ ;
WALKER, M .
STROKE, 1989, 20 (07) :864-870
[4]  
Chisolm Theresa H, 2005, Trends Amplif, V9, P111, DOI 10.1177/108471380500900303
[5]  
Chopra PK, 2004, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V38, P753, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01448.x
[6]   Disability in depression and back pain - Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting [J].
Chwastiak, LA ;
Von Korff, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) :507-514
[7]   Influence of stroke survivor characteristics and family conflict surrounding recovery on caregivers' mental and physical health [J].
Clark, PC ;
Dunbar, SB ;
Shields, CG ;
Viswanathan, B ;
Aycock, DM ;
Wolf, SL .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2004, 53 (06) :406-413
[8]   Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale [J].
Duncan, PW ;
Lai, SM ;
Tyler, D ;
Perera, S ;
Reker, DM ;
Studenski, S .
STROKE, 2002, 33 (11) :2593-2599
[9]   The lived experience of cardiac disease [J].
Margolis, Stephen A. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 51 (09) :645-645
[10]  
EVANS RL, 1987, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V68, P508