Machine Learning-Based Water Level Prediction in Lake Erie

被引:34
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Song [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] York Univ, Lassonde Sch Engn, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
machine learning; water levels; Lake Erie; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; MUTUAL INFORMATION; FLUCTUATIONS; REGRESSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/w12102654
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predicting water levels of Lake Erie is important in water resource management as well as navigation since water level significantly impacts cargo transport options as well as personal choices of recreational activities. In this paper, machine learning (ML) algorithms including Gaussian process (GP), multiple linear regression (MLR), multilayer perceptron (MLP), M5P model tree, random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) are applied to predict the water level in Lake Erie. From 2002 to 2014, meteorological data and one-day-ahead observed water level are the independent variables, and the daily water level is the dependent variable. The predictive results show that MLR and M5P have the highest accuracy regarding root mean square error ( RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The performance of ML models has also been compared against the performance of the process-based advanced hydrologic prediction system (AHPS), and the results indicate that ML models are superior in predictive accuracy compared to AHPS. Together with their time-saving advantage, this study shows that ML models, especially MLR and M5P, can be used for forecasting Lake Erie water levels and informing future water resources management.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Forecasting surface water level fluctuations of lake van by artificial neural networks [J].
Altunkaynak, Adduesselam .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (02) :399-408
[2]   Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches [J].
Alvisi, S ;
Mascellani, G ;
Franchini, M ;
Bárdossy, A .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (01) :1-17
[3]   Evaluation of the current state of mechanistic aquatic biogeochemical modeling [J].
Arhonditsis, GB ;
Brett, MT .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2004, 271 :13-26
[4]  
Atkeson CG, 1997, ARTIF INTELL REV, V11, P11, DOI 10.1023/A:1006559212014
[5]  
Bazartseren B, 2003, NEUROCOMPUTING, V55, P439, DOI [10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00388-6, 10.1016/S0925-2312(03)00388-5]
[6]   On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments [J].
Beck, MB ;
Ravetz, JR ;
Mulkey, LA ;
Barnwell, TO .
STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS, 1997, 11 (03) :229-254
[7]   Temporal and spatial dynamics of large lake hypoxia: Integrating statistical and three-dimensional dynamic models to enhance lake management criteria [J].
Bocaniov, Serghei A. ;
Scavia, Donald .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (06) :4247-4263
[8]  
Bolsenga S.J, 1993, CLAIR HDB
[9]  
BOYCE F M, 1980, Journal of Great Lakes Research, V6, P290
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32