Application of Hydrochar, Digestate, and Synthetic Fertilizer to a Miscanthus x giganteus Crop: Implications for Biomass and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

被引:29
|
作者
Adjuik, Toby [1 ]
Rodjom, Abbey M. [1 ]
Miller, Kimberley E. [1 ]
Reza, M. Toufiq M. [2 ]
Davis, Sarah C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio Univ, Voinovich Sch Leadership & Publ Affairs, Environm Studies Program, Bldg 22, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[2] Florida Inst Technol, Biomed & Chem Engn & Sci, 150 W Univ Blvd, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
[3] Ohio Univ, Dept Environm & Plant Biol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 24期
关键词
methane; advanced biofuel; soil amendments; nutrient response; biochar; hydrothermal carbonization; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; BIOGAS-DIGESTATE; NITROUS-OXIDE; ENERGY CROPS; YIELD; GROWTH; SOILS; MITIGATION; BIOCHAR;
D O I
10.3390/app10248953
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Featured Application Hydrothermally carbonized digestate from biogas systems can be applied to crops soils to reduce soil CO2 fluxes in some cases. Miscanthus x giganteus (miscanthus), a perennial biomass crop, allocates more carbon belowground and typically has lower soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than conventional feedstock crops, but best practices for nutrient management that maximize yield while minimizing soil GHG emissions are still debated. This study evaluated the effects of four different fertilization treatments (digestate from a biodigester, synthetic fertilizer (urea), hydrochar from the hydrothermal carbonization of digestate, and a control) on soil GHG emissions and biomass yield of an established miscanthus stand grown on abandoned agricultural land. Soil GHG fluxes (including CH4, CO2, and N2O) were sampled in all treatments using the static chamber methodology. Average biomass yield varied from 20.2 Mg ha(-1) to 23.5 Mg ha(-1), but there were no significant differences among the four treatments (p > 0.05). The hydrochar treatment reduced mean CO2 emissions by 34% compared to the control treatment, but this difference was only statistically significant in one of the two sites tested. Applying digestate to miscanthus resulted in a CH4 efflux from the soil in one of two sites, while soils treated with urea and hydrochar acted as CH4 sinks in both sites. Overall, fertilization did not significantly improve biomass yield, but hydrochar as a soil amendment has potential for reducing soil GHG fluxes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nitrate Leaching, and Biomass Yields from Production of Miscanthus x giganteus in Illinois, USA
    Behnke, Gevan D.
    David, Mark B.
    Voigt, Thomas B.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (04) : 801 - 813
  • [2] Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Nitrate Leaching, and Biomass Yields from Production of Miscanthus × giganteus in Illinois, USA
    Gevan D. Behnke
    Mark B. David
    Thomas B. Voigt
    BioEnergy Research, 2012, 5 : 801 - 813
  • [3] Digestate Application Methods and Rates with Regard to Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Crop Conditions
    Korba, Jaroslav
    Sarec, Petr
    Novak, Vaclav
    Broz, Pavel
    Dolan, Antonin
    Dedina, Martin
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [4] Are the benefits of yield responses to nitrogen fertilizer application in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus offset by increased soil emissions of nitrous oxide?
    Roth, Brendan
    Finnan, John M.
    Jones, Mike B.
    Burke, James I.
    Williams, Michael L.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (01): : 145 - 152
  • [5] Evaluation of herbicide efficacy and application timing for giant miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) biomass reduction
    Barksdale, Nicole
    Byrd, John D.
    Zaccaro, Maria Leticia M.
    Russell, David P.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 371 - 376
  • [6] The Effects of Moderate and Severe Salinity on Composition and Physiology in the Biomass Crop Miscanthus x giganteus
    Stavridou, Evangelia
    Webster, Richard J.
    Robson, Paul R. H.
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (10): : 1 - 27
  • [7] Effects of fertilizer application and dry/wet processing of Miscanthus x giganteus on bioethanol production
    Boakye-Boaten, Nana Abayie
    Xiu, Shuangning
    Shahbazi, Abolghasem
    Wang, Lijun
    Li, Rui
    Mims, Michelle
    Schimmel, Keith
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 98 - 105
  • [8] Effects of a 20-year old Miscanthus x giganteus stand and its removal on soil characteristics and greenhouse gas emissions
    Dufosse, K.
    Drewer, J.
    Gabrielle, B.
    Drouet, J-L
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 69 : 198 - 210
  • [9] Evaluating the role of landscape in the spread of invasive species: The case of the biomass crop Miscanthus x giganteus
    Muthukrishnan, Ranjan
    West, Natalie M.
    Davis, Adam S.
    Jordan, Nicholas R.
    Forester, James D.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2015, 317 : 6 - 15
  • [10] Aerial Imagery Can Detect Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects on Biomass and Stand Health of Miscanthus x giganteus
    Namoi, Nictor
    Jang, Chunhwa
    Robins, Zachary
    Lin, Cheng-Hsien
    Lim, Soo-Hyun
    Voigt, Thomas
    Lee, DoKyoung
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (06)