Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy

被引:18
作者
Kalcik, Macit [1 ]
Yesin, Mahmut [1 ]
Gursoy, Mustafa Ozan [1 ]
Gunduz, Sabahattin [1 ]
Karakoyun, Sueleyman [1 ]
Astarcioglu, Mehmet Ali [1 ]
Bayam, Emrah [1 ]
Cersit, Sinan [1 ]
Ozkan, Mehmet [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kosuyolu Kartal Heart Training & Res Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Univ Ardahan, Div Hlth Sci, Ardahan, Turkey
关键词
international normalized ratio; oral anticoagulation; point-of-care systems; warfarin; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY; OF-CARE ANALYZERS; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; SELF-MANAGEMENT; WARFARIN; METAANALYSIS; ACCURACY; DEVICES; TIME;
D O I
10.1177/1076029615595881
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Warfarin, which is a widely used oral anticoagulant, has a narrow therapeutic window and requires regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring to maintain optimal anticoagulation. Recently, several portable coagulometers have been developed to measure INR levels. Objective: To compare the INR results obtained by a portable coagulometer (CoaguChek XS) and a standard laboratory method (STAGO STA-R). Methods: Overall, 433 consecutive patients (male: 191, median age: 61 [44-86] years) who were admitted to outpatient anticoagulation clinic were enrolled in this study. Each patient was tested for INR using portable CoaguChek XS and STAGO STA-R automatic laboratory coagulometer. Correlation between methods was assessed using the Pearson correlation test and Cohen test. Bland-Altman plot was used to identify mean difference and 95% limits of agreement. Results: The mean INR values for CoaguChek XS and STAGO STA-R were 2.54 1.17 and 2.79 +/- 1.39, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the 2 methods (r = .966; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.97, P < .001). The Bland-Altman analysis gave a mean difference of 0.26 +/- 0.40 between the 2 methods, with a 95% limit of agreement of -0.54 to 1.05. In patients with INR values >5.0, there was only a moderate correlation (r = .676; 95% CI: 0.38-0.89, P = .002), and the mean difference of INR tended to increase as mean INR values increased. There was a high overall agreement between the 2 methods ( = .751; 95% CI: 0.69-0.80; P < .001). Conclusion: There was good consistency between traditional laboratory testing and CoaguChek XS coagulometer, which provides rapid and reliable INR analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 194
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF A PORTABLE PROTHROMBIN TIME MONITOR FOR HOME-USE BY PATIENTS WHO REQUIRE LONG-TERM ORAL ANTICOAGULANT-THERAPY
    ANDERSON, DR
    HARRISON, L
    HIRSH, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 153 (12) : 1441 - 1447
  • [2] Meta-analysis: Effect of Patient Self-testing and Self-management of Long-Term Anticoagulation on Major Clinical Outcomes
    Bloomfield, Hanna E.
    Krause, Ange
    Greer, Nancy
    Taylor, Brent C.
    MacDonald, Roderick
    Rutks, Indulis
    Reddy, Preetham
    Wilt, Timothy J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (07) : 472 - 482
  • [3] Patterns of use of antithrombotic therapy and quality of anticoagulation among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice
    Boulanger, L
    Kim, J
    Friedman, M
    Hauch, O
    Foster, T
    Menzin, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (03) : 258 - 264
  • [4] Precision and accuracy of point-of-care testing coagulometers used for self-testing and self-management of oral anticoagulation therapy
    Christensen, T. D.
    Larsen, T. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2012, 10 (02) : 251 - 260
  • [5] DeSantis G, 2012, AM J HEMATOL, V87, pS149
  • [6] Comparison of International Normalized Ratios provided by two point-of-care devices and laboratory-based venipuncture in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic
    Donaldson, Mark
    Sullivan, John
    Norbeck, Amber
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2010, 67 (19) : 1616 - 1622
  • [7] Advanced age, anticoagulation intensity, and risk for intracranial hemorrhage among patients taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation
    Fang, MC
    Chang, YC
    Hylek, EM
    Rosand, J
    Greenberg, SM
    Go, AS
    Singer, DE
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (10) : 745 - 752
  • [8] Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data
    Heneghan, Carl
    Ward, Alison
    Perera, Rafael
    Bankhead, Clare
    Fuller, Alice
    Stevens, Richard
    Bradford, Kairen
    Tyndel, Sally
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Ansell, Jack
    Beyth, Rebecca
    Bernardo, Artur
    Christensen, Thomas Decker
    Cromheecke, Manon
    Edson, Robert G.
    Fitzmaurice, David
    Gadisseur, Alain P. A.
    Garcia-Alamino, Josep M.
    Gardiner, Chris
    Hasenkam, Michael
    Jacobson, Alan
    Kaatz, Scott
    Kamali, Farhad
    Khan, Tayyaba Irfan
    Knight, Eve
    Kortke, Heinrich
    Levi, Marcel
    Matchar, David Bruce
    Menendez-Jandula, Barbara
    Rakovac, Ivo
    Schaefer, Christian
    Siebenhofer, Andrea
    Souto, Juan Carlos
    Sunderji, Rubina
    Gin, Kenneth
    Shalansky, Karen
    Voller, Heinz
    Wagner, Otto
    Zittermann, Armin
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9813) : 322 - 334
  • [9] Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions
    Holbrook, AM
    Pereira, JA
    Labiris, R
    McDonald, H
    Douketis, JD
    Crowther, M
    Wells, PS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (10) : 1095 - 1106
  • [10] Accuracy of capillary whole blood international normalized ratio on the CoaguChek S, CoaguChek XS, and i-STAT 1 point-of-care analyzers
    Karon, Brad S.
    McBane, Robert D., II
    Chaudhry, Rajeev
    Beyer, Lisa K.
    Santrach, Paula J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 130 (01) : 88 - 92