Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection: A single-center retrospective study

被引:10
作者
Nagaoka, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Fukunaga, Yosuke [1 ]
Mukai, Toshiki [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Tomohiro [1 ]
Nagasaki, Toshiya [1 ]
Akiyoshi, Takashi [1 ]
Konishi, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Nagayama, Satoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Canc Inst Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
anastomotic leakage; low anterior resection; risk factors; without stoma; LOW-RECTAL-CANCER; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RESECTION; MULTICENTER; SURGERY; ILEOSTOMY; IMPACT; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; DYSFUNCTION;
D O I
10.1111/ases.12900
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication affecting short-term and long-term outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. While laparoscopic low anterior resection is a widespread procedure, the risk factors for AL are not well established. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for AL after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique (DST) anastomosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis for rectal cancer between January 2010 and February 2019. Finally, a total of 1197 patients were eligible for the study. Twenty-five variables were collected for univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: AL occurred in 49 patients (4.1%). In multivariate analysis, blood loss (>= 70 mL) and no defunctioning stoma were independent risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-4.34; P = .030 and OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.66-6.37; P = .0003, respectively). In addition, risk factors for AL were analyzed in 601 patients without defunctioning stoma. As a result, AL occurred in 36 patients (6.0%) and multivariate analysis demonstrated that blood loss (>= 70 mL) and anastomotic level from anal verge (<5 cm) were independent risk factors (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.24-7.44; P = .016 and OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.14-4.69; P = .020, respectively). Conclusion: Laparoscopic low anterior resection is feasible and safe with a low AL rate. Important factors associated with AL were blood loss and defunctioning stoma. Without defunctioning stoma, blood loss and distal anastomosis are also important factors.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 488
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer A Noninferiority Meta-analysis of Quality of Surgical Resection Outcomes [J].
Acuna, Sergio A. ;
Chesney, Tyler R. ;
Ramjist, Joshua K. ;
Shah, Prakesh S. ;
Kennedy, Erin D. ;
Baxter, Nancy N. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (05) :849-855
[2]   Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer [J].
Akiyoshi, Takashi ;
Ueno, Masashi ;
Fukunaga, Yosuke ;
Nagayama, Satoshi ;
Fujimoto, Yoshiya ;
Konishi, Tsuyoshi ;
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya ;
Yamaguchi, Toshiharu .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (03) :259-264
[3]   Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer [J].
Akiyoshi, Takashi ;
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya ;
Oya, Masatoshi ;
Konishi, Tsuyoshi ;
Fukuda, Meiki ;
Fujimoto, Yoshiya ;
Ueno, Masashi ;
Miyata, Satoshi ;
Yamaguchi, Toshiharu .
SURGERY, 2009, 146 (03) :483-489
[4]   Sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery [J].
Celentano, V. ;
Cohen, R. ;
Warusavitarne, J. ;
Faiz, O. ;
Chand, M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (11) :1523-1530
[5]   Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer [J].
Cercek, Andrea ;
Roxburgh, Campbell S. D. ;
Strombom, Paul ;
Smith, J. Joshua ;
Temple, Larissa K. F. ;
Nash, Garrett M. ;
Guillem, Jose G. ;
Paty, Philip B. ;
Yaeger, Rona ;
Stadler, Zsofia K. ;
Seier, Kenneth ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Segal, Neil H. ;
Reidy, Diane L. ;
Varghese, Anna ;
Shia, Jinru ;
Vakiani, Efsevia ;
Wu, Abraham J. ;
Crane, Christopher H. ;
Gollub, Marc J. ;
Garcia-Aguilar, Julio ;
Saltz, Leonard B. ;
Weiser, Martin R. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (06)
[6]  
Chude GG, 2008, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V55, P1562
[7]   Trends and outcomes in laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer from 2005 to 2016 using the ACS-NSQIP database, a retrospective cohort study [J].
Davis, Catherine H. ;
Gaglani, Tanmay ;
Moore, Linda W. ;
Du, Xianglin L. ;
Hwang, Hyunsoo ;
Yamal, Jose-Miguel ;
Bailey, H. Randolph ;
Cusick, Marianne, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 63 :71-76
[8]   Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Fleshman, James ;
Branda, Megan ;
Sargent, Daniel J. ;
Boller, Anne Marie ;
George, Virgilio ;
Abbas, Maher ;
Peters, Walter R., Jr. ;
Maun, Dipen ;
Chang, George ;
Herline, Alan ;
Fichera, Alessandro ;
Mutch, Matthew ;
Wexner, Steven ;
Whiteford, Mark ;
Marks, John ;
Birnbaum, Elisa ;
Margolin, David ;
Larson, David ;
Marcello, Peter ;
Posner, Mitchell ;
Read, Thomas ;
Monson, John ;
Wren, Sherry M. ;
Pisters, Peter W. T. ;
Nelson, Heidi .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (13) :1346-1355
[9]   Randomised multicentre trial of circular stapling devices [J].
Folkesson, Joakim ;
Brown, Steven S. R. ;
Gunnarsson, Ulf ;
Pahlman, Lars .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (02) :227-232
[10]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726