Historical Changes in Water Quality at German Branch in the Choptank River Basin

被引:14
作者
Sutton, Adrienne J. [1 ,2 ]
Fisher, Thomas R. [2 ]
Gustafson, Anne B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Zool, Corvallis, OR 97333 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Horn Point Lab, Cambridge, MD 21613 USA
关键词
Agricultural management; Water quality; Nutrients; Chesapeake Bay; ATLANTIC COASTAL-PLAIN; CHESAPEAKE BAY; NITRATE CONTAMINATION; NITROGEN; EUTROPHICATION; AGRICULTURE; PHOSPHORUS; HYDROCHEMISTRY; RESTORATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-008-9884-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many management strategies to improve the health of Chesapeake Bay focus on reducing losses of sediments and nutrients from agricultural land. Plot-scale studies have suggested that Best Management Practices (BMPs) reduce these losses, and natural resource managers have since supported implementation of a variety of BMPs on farms in the Chesapeake Bay watershed over the last two decades. As a test of the efficiency of these BMPs at the watershed scale, all farms within German Branch watershed had BMPs implemented in the early 1990s. Using water quality from two past monitoring programs (i.e., in 1986 and 1991-1995) and current water quality monitoring (i.e., collected 2003-2006), we detected a 28% decrease in baseflow P concentrations a decade after BMP implementation. There were no significant changes in nitrate or total nitrogen concentrations between BMP implementation and the most recent sampling. However, the significant rate of increase (similar to 0.08 mg N L(-1) year(-1)) from 1986 to the 1990s did not continue to 2003-2006 baseflow conditions, which suggests that BMPs may have suppressed the rate of increase in nitrogen observed earlier in German. These data suggest that other management practices that increase agricultural N losses and natural processes that attenuate N losses at the watershed scale may obscure significant N reductions by current BMPs in the watershed.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 369
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, MANAGING NITROGEN GR
  • [2] Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean
    Beman, JM
    Arrigo, KR
    Matson, PA
    [J]. NATURE, 2005, 434 (7030) : 211 - 214
  • [3] Ecology - Synthesizing US river restoration efforts
    Bernhardt, ES
    Palmer, MA
    Allan, JD
    Alexander, G
    Barnas, K
    Brooks, S
    Carr, J
    Clayton, S
    Dahm, C
    Follstad-Shah, J
    Galat, D
    Gloss, S
    Goodwin, P
    Hart, D
    Hassett, B
    Jenkinson, R
    Katz, S
    Kondolf, GM
    Lake, PS
    Lave, R
    Meyer, JL
    O'Donnell, TK
    Pagano, L
    Powell, B
    Sudduth, E
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 308 (5722) : 636 - 637
  • [4] Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: Scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture
    Boesch, DF
    Brinsfield, RB
    Magnien, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2001, 30 (02) : 303 - 320
  • [5] BOHLKE JK, 1995, WATER RESOUR RES, V31, P2319, DOI 10.1029/95WR01584
  • [6] Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA
    Boyer, EW
    Goodale, CL
    Jaworsk, NA
    Howarth, RW
    [J]. BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 57 (01) : 137 - 169
  • [7] Butler JS, 2005, J ENVIRON QUAL, V34, P370
  • [8] CARPENTER JH, 1969, EUTROPHICATION CAUSE, P210
  • [9] *CHES BAY COMM, 2000, CHES BAY AGR
  • [10] Chesapeake Bay Commission, 2004, COST EFF STRAT BAY S