PROBABILITY AGGREGATION IN TIME-SERIES: DYNAMIC HIERARCHICAL MODELING OF SPARSE EXPERT BELIEFS

被引:17
作者
Satopaa, Ville A. [1 ]
Jensen, Shane T. [1 ]
Mellers, Barbara A. [2 ]
Tetlock, Philip E. [2 ]
Ungar, Lyle H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Probability aggregation; dynamic linear model; hierarchical modeling; expert forecast; subjective probability; bias estimation; calibration; time series; MULTIVARIATE QUANTITIES; ENSEMBLE PREDICTIONS; OUTPUT STATISTICS; SURFACE WINDS; FORECASTS; CONSENSUS; OVERCONFIDENCE; DISTRIBUTIONS; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1214/14-AOAS739
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Most subjective probability aggregation procedures use a single probability judgment from each expert, even though it is common for experts studying real problems to update their probability estimates over time. This paper advances into unexplored areas of probability aggregation by considering a dynamic context in which experts can update their beliefs at random intervals. The updates occur very infrequently, resulting in a sparse data set that cannot be modeled by standard time-series procedures. In response to the lack of appropriate methodology, this paper presents a hierarchical model that takes into account the expert's level of self-reported expertise and produces aggregate probabilities that are sharp and well calibrated both in-and out-of-sample. The model is demonstrated on a real-world data set that includes over 2300 experts making multiple probability forecasts over two years on different subsets of 166 international political events.
引用
收藏
页码:1256 / 1280
页数:25
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Probability Aggregation Methods in Geoscience [J].
Allard, D. ;
Comunian, A. ;
Renard, P. .
MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 (05) :545-581
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, 82113 UCBCSD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, TIME SERIES TECHNIQU
[5]   The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges [J].
Ariely, D ;
Au, WT ;
Bender, RH ;
Budescu, DV ;
Dietz, CB ;
Gu, HB ;
Wallsten, TS ;
Zauberman, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2000, 6 (02) :130-147
[6]   Performance of National Weather Service forecasts compared to operational, consensus, and weighted model output statistics [J].
Baars, JA ;
Mass, CF .
WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2005, 20 (06) :1034-1047
[7]   Two Reasons to Make Aggregated Probability Forecasts More Extreme [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Mellers, Barbara A. ;
Tetlock, Philip E. ;
Stone, Eric ;
Ungar, Lyle H. .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2014, 11 (02) :133-145
[8]  
Batchelder WH, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6007, P98, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12079-4_15
[9]   Implications of the research on expert overconfidence and dependence [J].
Bier, V .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) :321-329
[10]  
Bonferroni C., 1936, Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412961288.N455