Advance payment systems: Paying too much today and being satisfied tomorrow

被引:11
作者
Schulz, Fabian [1 ]
Schlereth, Christian [2 ]
Mazar, Nina [3 ]
Skiera, Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Mkt, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Mkt & Sales Grp, Chair Digital Mkt, D-56179 Vallendar, Germany
[3] Univ Toronto, Joseph L Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON M5S 3E6, Canada
关键词
Innovation; Pricing; Satisfaction; Payment sequence preferences; LOSS AVERSION; PRICE KNOWLEDGE; PROSPECT-THEORY; PREFERENCES; SEQUENCES; CUSTOMER; SEARCH; CHOICE; MONEY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.03.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Advance payment systems represent a pricing innovation, in which companies predict customers' future consumption for the following year and then bill a series of monthly, uniform advance payments. Any difference between predicted and actual consumption gets settled at the end of the year with a refund or extra payment. Companies thus gain earlier access to funds and lower risk of customer defaults; customers benefit from predictable monthly payments. However, customers' reactions to a refund or extra payment sequence in an advance payment system remain unclear. Three theoretical lenses offer predictions about customers' advance payment system preferences: prospect theory, with a focus on silver lining and hedonic editing principles; mental accounting; and the value of sequences. Using three empirical studies with survey and billing data of more than 20,000 customers to examine their reactions to refunds and extra payments, this paper reveals that receiving a refund reduces customers' price awareness, increases their recommendation likelihood, and reduces churn and tariff switching, as long as the refund is not too high. The findings illustrate both the consequences and the boundary conditions of the silver lining principle with large-scale field studies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 250
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   An analysis of the profitability of fee-based compensation plans for search engine marketing [J].
Abou Nabout, Nadia ;
Skiera, Bernd ;
Stepanchuk, Tanja ;
Gerstmeier, Eva .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2012, 29 (01) :68-80
[2]   Aligning benefits with payments: A test of the pattern alignment hypothesis [J].
Auh, Seigyoung ;
Shih, Eric ;
Yoon, Yeosun .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) :292-303
[3]  
Ayers B.C., 1999, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, V21, P55
[4]  
Bansal H.S., 2000, Journal of Service Research, V3, P166, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050032005, DOI 10.1177/109467050032005, 10.1177/109467050032005]
[5]   Testing competing models of loss aversion: an adversarial collaboration [J].
Bateman, I ;
Kahneman, D ;
Munro, A ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (08) :1561-1580
[6]   A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences [J].
Bateman, I ;
Munro, A ;
Rhodes, B ;
Starmer, C ;
Sugden, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) :479-505
[7]   Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money [J].
Chapman, GB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :59-75
[8]   THE PRICE KNOWLEDGE AND SEARCH OF SUPERMARKET SHOPPERS [J].
DICKSON, PR ;
SAWYER, AG .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (03) :42-53
[9]   Pennies-a-day: The effect of temporal reframing on transaction evaluation [J].
Gourville, JT .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 24 (04) :395-408
[10]   Mental budgeting and consumer decisions [J].
Heath, C ;
Soll, JB .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1996, 23 (01) :40-52