The Correlation Between Migraine and Patent Foramen Ovale

被引:41
|
作者
Liu, Kaiming [1 ]
Wang, Brian Z. [2 ]
Hao, Yishu [3 ]
Song, Shuijiang [1 ]
Pan, Mengxiong [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Neurol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Clin Diagnost Lab, NTU Imperial Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Hangzhou Hosp Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Neurol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] First Peoples Hosp Huzhou, Dept Neurol, Huzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Huzhou Teachers Coll, Dept Neurol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Huzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
migraine; patent foramen ovale; prevalence; patent foramen ovale closure; systematic review; TO-LEFT SHUNT; SEPTAL-DEFECT CLOSURE; PERCUTANEOUS CLOSURE; TRANSCATHETER CLOSURE; HEADACHE RELIEF; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; CRYPTOGENIC STROKE; IMPROVING MIGRAINE; EUSTACHIAN VALVE;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2020.543485
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Migraine is a widespread neurological disorder. The patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a remnant of the fetal circulation. Multiple studies suggest that migraine is more prevalent in subjects with PFO and vice versa. It is unclear if there is a causal relationship or simply a co-existence of these two conditions. Furthermore, the treatment of migraine with percutaneous closure PFO remains controversial. Methods: We reviewed studies pertaining to the relationship between PFO and migraine as well as the effects of treatments on migraine attacks. Results: We briefly summarized potential pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine, and elaborated on migraine type, frequency, and clinical symptoms of migraine with PFO and the clinical features of PFO with migraine. We also addressed the effects of PFO closure on migraine attacks. Conclusion: The evidence supports a "dose-response" relationship between migraine and PFO although more work needs to be done in terms of patient selection as well as the inclusion of an antiplatelet control group for PFO closure interventions to uncover possible beneficial results in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] To Be or Not to Be Patent: The Relationship Between Migraine and Patent Foramen Ovale
    Eren, Nihan Kahya
    Bulbul, Nazli G.
    Tuluce, Selcen Yakar
    Nazli, Cem
    Beckmann, Yesim
    HEADACHE, 2015, 55 (07): : 934 - 942
  • [2] Patent foramen ovale and migraine: What is the relationship between the two?
    Sathasivam, Sivarani
    Sathasivam, Sivakumar
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (3-4) : 256 - 259
  • [3] Migraine and Patent Foramen Ovale
    Ailani, Jessica
    CURRENT NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE REPORTS, 2014, 14 (02)
  • [4] Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine: Closing the DebateA Review
    Tariq, Nauman
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Kriegler, Jennifer S.
    HEADACHE, 2016, 56 (03): : 462 - 478
  • [5] Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine Attacks: A Systematic Review
    Lip, Philomena Z. Y.
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 127 (05) : 411 - 420
  • [6] No Relationship Between Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine Frequency
    Larrosa, Davinia
    Ramon, Cesar
    Alvarez, Rocio
    Martinez-Camblor, Pablo
    Cernuda, Eva
    Pascual, Julio
    HEADACHE, 2016, 56 (09): : 1466 - 1473
  • [7] The Connection Between Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine
    Kumar, Preetham
    Kijima, Yasufumi
    West, Brian H.
    Tobis, Jonathan M.
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 29 (02) : 261 - +
  • [8] Is patent foramen ovale closure indicated for migraine? Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Migraine
    Reisman, Mark
    Fuller, Cindy J.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (05) : 468 - 474
  • [9] Migraine and patent foramen ovale
    Lucas, C.
    REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2013, 169 (05) : 390 - 396
  • [10] Frequency of Patent Foramen Ovale and Migraine in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke
    West, Brian H.
    Noureddin, Nabil
    Mamzhi, Yakov
    Low, Christopher G.
    Coluzzi, Alexandra C.
    Shih, Evan J.
    Fleming, Rubine Gevorgyan
    Saver, Jeffrey L.
    Liebeskind, David S.
    Charles, Andrew
    Tobis, Jonathan M.
    STROKE, 2018, 49 (05) : 1123 - 1128