The Economics and Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements

被引:50
作者
Baccini, Leonardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
[2] CIREQ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T7, Canada
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 22 | 2019年 / 22卷
关键词
trade agreements; political economy of trade; foreign direct investment; heterogeneous firms; trade policy; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS; DOMESTIC POLITICS; DESIGN; LIBERALIZATION; POLICY; COMPETITION; REGIONALISM; PROTECTION; FIRM;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070708
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The number of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) has skyrocketed over the past 20 years. In addition to reducing barriers at the border, modern PTAs remove many behind-the-border barriers by regulating foreign direct investment (FDI), liberalizing services, and protecting intellectual property rights. This article surveys the literature explaining the formation of PTAs and their consequences. Regarding the formation of PTAs, studies have gradually moved from exploring the macro-foundation of preferential liberalization to focusing on the micro-foundation of PTAs, relying on industry- and firm-level data. Regarding the effect of PTAs, there is robust evidence that PTAs substantively increase trade flows and FDI and are associated with economic reforms in developing countries, though the general welfare effect of preferential liberalization remains largely unexplored. I make some concrete suggestions on avenues toward which to push the research on PTAs. In particular, I argue that scholars interested in PTAs would benefit from engaging in debate about the distributional consequences of trade liberalization, which not only informs much of the current academic and policy research but also features in political debates taking place in democratic polities.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 92
页数:18
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   The concept of legalization [J].
Abbott, KW ;
Keohane, RO ;
Moravcsik, A ;
Slaughter, AM ;
Snidal, D .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 54 (03) :401-+
[2]   Negotiating free trade [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Antras, Pol ;
Helpman, Elhanan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 73 (01) :1-30
[3]   Veto players and the design of preferential trade agreements [J].
Allee, Todd ;
Elsig, Manfred .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 24 (03) :538-567
[4]   Is the European Union Trade Deal with Canada New or Recycled? A Text-as-data Approach [J].
Allee, Todd ;
Elsig, Manfred ;
Lugg, Andrew .
GLOBAL POLICY, 2017, 8 (02) :246-252
[5]   Who wrote the rules for the Trans-Pacific Partnership? [J].
Allee, Todd ;
Lugg, Andrew .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2016, 3 (03)
[6]   Why do some international institutions contain strong dispute settlement provisions? New evidence from preferential trade agreements [J].
Allee, Todd ;
Elsig, Manfred .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2016, 11 (01) :89-120
[7]   EVALUATING THREE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES [J].
Allee, Todd ;
Peinhardt, Clint .
WORLD POLITICS, 2014, 66 (01) :47-+
[8]   The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law [J].
Alschner, Wolfgang ;
Pauwelyn, Joost ;
Puig, Sergio .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2017, 20 (02) :217-231
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2009, INVESTING PROTECTION
[10]   Cooperative Autocracies: Leader Survival, Creditworthiness, and Bilateral Investment Treaties [J].
Arias, Eric ;
Hollyer, James R. ;
Rosendorff, B. Peter .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (04) :905-921