Finite Element Analysis to Compare Complete Denture and Implant-Retained Overdentures With Different Attachment Systems

被引:38
作者
Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino [1 ]
Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves [1 ]
Tabata, Lucas Fernando [1 ]
Delben, Juliana Aparecida [1 ]
Gomes, Erica Alves [1 ]
Capello de Sousa, Edson Antonio [2 ]
Rocha, Eduardo Passos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, Bauru Engn Sch, Dept Mech Engn, BR-16015050 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Dental implants; complete denture; overdenture; attachment; finite element analysis; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; LOAD-TRANSFER; IN-VITRO; MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES; CONVENTIONAL DENTURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SUPPORTED PROSTHESES; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; BAR ATTACHMENTS; TEETH;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb395
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This finite element analysis compared stress distribution on complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems. Four models of edentulous mandible were constructed: group A (control), complete denture; group B, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip system; group C, overdenture retained by 2 unsplinted implants with o'ring system; and group D, overdenture retained by 2 splinted implants with bar-clip and 2 distally placed o'ring system. Evaluation was performed on Ansys software, with 100-N vertical load applied on central incisive teeth. The lowest maximum general stress value (in megapascal) was observed in group A (64.305) followed by groups C (119.006), D (258.650), and B (349.873). The same trend occurred it) supporting tissues with the highest stress value for cortical bone. Unsplinted implants associated with the o'ring attachment system showed the lowest maximum stress values among all overdenture groups. Furthermore, o'ring system also improved stress distribution when associated with bar-clip system.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1071
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW
    ADELL, R
    LEKHOLM, U
    ROCKLER, B
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06): : 387 - 416
  • [2] Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA
    Assuncao, W. G.
    Tabata, L. F.
    Barao, V. A. R.
    Rocha, E. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 35 (10) : 766 - 774
  • [3] Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients:: satisfaction and quality of life
    Assuncao, Wirley Goncalves
    Zardo, Glaucia Glowacki
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino
    [J]. GERODONTOLOGY, 2007, 24 (04) : 235 - 238
  • [4] Awad MA, 2003, INT J PROSTHODONT, V16, P117
  • [5] Bakke M, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P575
  • [6] Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog
    Barbier, L
    Vander Sloten, J
    Krzesinski, G
    Schepers, E
    Van Der Perre, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (11) : 847 - 858
  • [7] Ben-Ur Z, 1996, Quintessence Int, V27, P603
  • [8] Branemark P I, 1977, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, V16, P1
  • [9] Çaglar A, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P36
  • [10] Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures
    Celik, Gozde
    Uludag, Bulent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 97 (04) : 229 - 235