Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy

被引:53
作者
Dev, Harveer S. [1 ,2 ]
Wiklund, Peter [3 ]
Patel, Vipul [4 ]
Parashar, Deepak [2 ,5 ]
Palmer, Kenneth [4 ]
Nyberg, Tommy [3 ]
Skarecky, Doug [6 ]
Neal, David E. [1 ,2 ]
Ahlering, Tom [6 ]
Sooriakumaran, Prasanna [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Urol, Cambridge, England
[2] Canc Res UK Cambridge Inst, Cambridge, England
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Global Robot Inst, Dept Urol, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Univ Warwick, Div Hlth Sci, Canc Res Unit, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Irvine, CA USA
[7] Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Surg Intervent Trials Unit, Oxford, England
关键词
Robotic-assisted prostatectomy; Positive surgical margin; Length; Location; Biochemical recurrence; ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; PATTERNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a current standard treatment for localized prostate cancer, with treatment failure defined by biochemical recurrence (BCR). Open radical prostatectomy series have identified the presence of a positive surgical margin (PSM) as a predictor of long-term recurrence, a measure that is affected by the surgeon's skill. We evaluate the effect of PSM parameters on BCR rates from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, across 3 high-volume institutions. Methods: De-identifiable clinicopathological and histopathological data were prospectively collected for 4,001 patients with at least 3 years of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier plots and 3 statistical models were used to evaluate the effect of margin parameters on BCR, via crude rates, traditional multivariable Cox regression, and a propensity-adjusted Cox regression model. Results: Overall, 37% of men with a PSM developed BCR compared with 10% of men with negative margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.47-2.22). Length >= 3 mm or a multifocal positive margin was associated with a higher risk of BCR compared with negative margin cases. On multivariable Cox regression analysis of the positive margin cohort, only apical margins significantly predicted BCR relative to basal margins (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.01-4.09), whereas there was no significant difference in BCR rates for posterolateral margins relative to basal margins (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.84-3.11). Propensity-adjusted modeling confirmed a greater effect of apical compared with posterolateral PSM. Conclusions: A PSM length >= 3 mm is predictive of BCR, as is to a lesser extent multiple positive margins. In contrast to open prostatectomy series, posterolateral margins carry a smaller risk of BCR compared with apical margins. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109.e7 / 109.e13
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Woo, D ;
Eichel, L ;
Lee, DI ;
Edwards, R ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (05) :819-822
[2]   Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Prostatectomy Differs by Disease Risk Group [J].
Alkhateeb, Sultan ;
Alibhai, Shabbir ;
Fleshner, Neil ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Zlotta, Alexandre ;
Nesbitt, Michael ;
Lockwood, Gina ;
Trachtenberg, John .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) :145-150
[3]   Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Rider, Jennifer R. ;
Taari, Kimmo ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Andren, Ove ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (10) :932-942
[4]   The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era [J].
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Karnes, R. Jeffrey ;
Crispen, Paul L. ;
Carlson, Rachel E. ;
Rangel, Laureano J. ;
Bergstralh, Eric J. ;
Blute, Michael L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) :1003-1009
[5]   Hypothermic Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy: Rationale, Feasibility, and Effect on Early Continence [J].
Finley, David S. ;
Osann, Kathryn ;
Skarecky, Douglas ;
Ahlering, Thomas E. .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (04) :691-696
[6]   Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization [J].
Fontenot, Philip A. ;
Mansour, Ahmed M. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) :E290-E299
[7]   Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Humphreys, EB ;
Mangold, LA ;
Eisenberger, M ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :433-439
[8]   EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Advanced, Relapsing, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer [J].
Heidenreich, Axel ;
Bastian, Patrick J. ;
Bellmunt, Joaquim ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Joniau, Steven ;
van der Kwast, Theodor ;
Mason, Malcolm ;
Matveev, Vsevolod ;
Wiegel, Thomas ;
Zattoni, Filiberto ;
Mottet, Nicolas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) :467-479
[9]   Global Patterns of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Center, Melissa M. ;
DeSantis, Carol ;
Ward, Elizabeth M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (08) :1893-1907
[10]   Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer [J].
Johansson, JE ;
Andrén, O ;
Andersson, SO ;
Dickman, PW ;
Holmberg, L ;
Magnuson, A ;
Adami, HO .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (22) :2713-2719