Instream and riparian implications of weed cutting in a chalk river

被引:33
作者
Old, G. H. [1 ]
Naden, P. S. [1 ]
Rameshwaran, P. [1 ]
Acreman, M. C. [1 ]
Baker, S. [1 ]
Edwards, F. K. [1 ]
Sorensen, J. P. R. [2 ]
Mountford, O. [1 ]
Gooddy, D. C. [2 ]
Stratford, C. J. [1 ]
Scarlett, P. M. [1 ]
Newman, J. R. [1 ]
Neal, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] British Geol Survey, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Weed cutting; Conveyance; Wetland; Chalk stream; Management; Ecology; AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT; FRESH-WATER; MACROPHYTE GROWTH; METHANE EMISSIONS; LOWLAND STREAMS; SEDIMENT; FLOW; VEGETATION; ENGLAND; INVERTEBRATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Macrophyte growth is extensive in the iconic chalk streams that are concentrated in southern and eastern England. Widespread and frequent weed cutting is undertaken to maintain their key functions (e.g. flood water conveyance and maintenance of viable fisheries). In this study, a multidisciplinary approach was adopted to quantify coincident physico-chemical responses (instream and riparian) that result from weed cutting and to discuss their potential implications. Three weed cuts were monitored at a site on the River Lambourn (The CEH River Lambourn Observatory) and major instream and riparian impacts were observed. Measurements clearly demonstrated how weed cutting enhanced flood flow conveyance, reduced water levels (river and wetland), increased river velocities, and mobilised suspended sediment(with associated chemicals) and reduced the capacity for its retention within the river channel. Potential implications in relation to flood risk, water resources, downstream water quality, instream and riparian ecology, amenity value of the river, and wetland greenhouse gas emissions were considered. Provided the major influence of macrophytes on instream and riparian environments is fully understood then the manipulation of macrophytes represents an effective management tool that demonstrates the great potential of working with nature. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 300
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]  
Rodwell J.S., 1995, BRIT PLANT COMMUNITI, V4
[52]   Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near-bed flow in lowland streams [J].
Sand-Jensen, K .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1998, 39 (04) :663-679
[53]   The influence of macrophytes on sedimentation and nutrient retention in the lower River Spree (Germany) [J].
Schulz, M ;
Kozerski, HP ;
Pluntke, T ;
Rinke, K .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (03) :569-578
[54]   Methane emissions from freshwater riverine wetlands [J].
Sha, Chenyan ;
Mitsch, William J. ;
Mander, Uelo ;
Lu, Jianjian ;
Batson, Jackie ;
Zhang, Li ;
He, Wenshan .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 37 (01) :16-24
[55]  
SHANNON RD, 1994, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V27, P35, DOI 10.1007/BF00002570
[56]   PERCEPTION OF WATER CLARITY AND COLOR IN TERMS OF SUITABILITY FOR RECREATIONAL USE [J].
SMITH, DG ;
DAVIESCOLLEY, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1992, 36 (03) :225-235
[57]   Water Level Monitoring Pressure TransducersuA Need for Industry-Wide Standards [J].
Sorensen, James P. R. ;
Butcher, Andrew S. .
GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2011, 31 (04) :56-62
[58]   Fine sediment influence on salmonid spawning habitat in a lowland agricultural stream: a preliminary assessment [J].
Soulsby, C ;
Youngson, AF ;
Moir, HJ ;
Malcolm, IA .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 265 (1-3) :295-307
[59]  
SPINK AJ, 1993, J AQUAT PLANT MANAGE, V31, P113
[60]  
SWALES S, 1982, FISH MANAGE, V13, P125