Instream and riparian implications of weed cutting in a chalk river

被引:33
作者
Old, G. H. [1 ]
Naden, P. S. [1 ]
Rameshwaran, P. [1 ]
Acreman, M. C. [1 ]
Baker, S. [1 ]
Edwards, F. K. [1 ]
Sorensen, J. P. R. [2 ]
Mountford, O. [1 ]
Gooddy, D. C. [2 ]
Stratford, C. J. [1 ]
Scarlett, P. M. [1 ]
Newman, J. R. [1 ]
Neal, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[2] British Geol Survey, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Weed cutting; Conveyance; Wetland; Chalk stream; Management; Ecology; AQUATIC PLANT MANAGEMENT; FRESH-WATER; MACROPHYTE GROWTH; METHANE EMISSIONS; LOWLAND STREAMS; SEDIMENT; FLOW; VEGETATION; ENGLAND; INVERTEBRATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Macrophyte growth is extensive in the iconic chalk streams that are concentrated in southern and eastern England. Widespread and frequent weed cutting is undertaken to maintain their key functions (e.g. flood water conveyance and maintenance of viable fisheries). In this study, a multidisciplinary approach was adopted to quantify coincident physico-chemical responses (instream and riparian) that result from weed cutting and to discuss their potential implications. Three weed cuts were monitored at a site on the River Lambourn (The CEH River Lambourn Observatory) and major instream and riparian impacts were observed. Measurements clearly demonstrated how weed cutting enhanced flood flow conveyance, reduced water levels (river and wetland), increased river velocities, and mobilised suspended sediment(with associated chemicals) and reduced the capacity for its retention within the river channel. Potential implications in relation to flood risk, water resources, downstream water quality, instream and riparian ecology, amenity value of the river, and wetland greenhouse gas emissions were considered. Provided the major influence of macrophytes on instream and riparian environments is fully understood then the manipulation of macrophytes represents an effective management tool that demonstrates the great potential of working with nature. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 300
页数:11
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive [J].
Acreman, M. C. ;
Ferguson, A. J. D. .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) :32-48
[2]  
Allen DJ, 2010, HYDROGEOL J, V18, P1125, DOI 10.1007/s10040-010-0592-2
[3]   Methane flux from created riparian marshes: Relationship to intermittent versus continuous inundation and emergent macrophytes [J].
Altor, Anne E. ;
Mitsch, William J. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 28 (03) :224-234
[4]   Greenhouse gas emissions from a Danish riparian wetland before and after restoration [J].
Audet, Joachim ;
Elsgaard, Lars ;
Kjaergaard, Charlotte ;
Larsen, Soren E. ;
Hoffmann, Carl C. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 57 :170-182
[5]   Impacts of different weed cutting practices on macrophyte species diversity and composition in a Danish stream [J].
Baattrup-Pedersen, A ;
Riis, T .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, 20 (02) :103-114
[6]   Composition and richness of macrophyte communities in small Danish streams - influence of environmental factors and weed cutting [J].
Baattrup-Pedersen, A ;
Larsen, SE ;
Riis, T .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2003, 495 (1-3) :171-179
[7]  
BLAKE M, 1994, ANN ZOOL FENN, V31, P297
[8]  
Bovee K.D., 1982, FWSOBS8226 US FISH W
[9]  
British Standards Institution, 1980, 3680 BS 3A
[10]  
Bullock A., 1991, 115 I HYDR, P138