Mineralogy, size, morphology and porosity of aggregates and their relationship with soil susceptibility to water erosion

被引:12
作者
Figueiredo, MD [1 ]
Augustin, CHRR
Fabris, JD
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Geociencias, Dept Geog, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Ciencias Exatas, Dept Quim, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
HYPERFINE INTERACTIONS | 1999年 / 122卷 / 1-2期
关键词
iron oxides; tropical soils; piping; soil minerals;
D O I
10.1023/A:1012610126034
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学]; O56 [分子物理学、原子物理学];
学科分类号
070203 ; 070304 ; 081704 ; 1406 ;
摘要
Soil erosion has been considered as the main process related to losses of soil mass and decrease of productivity in cultivated lands as well as one of the most important processes in landscape evolution. Attention has been paid to many pedological variables affecting intensity of erosion, but little to the influence of iron compounds on the type, size, shape and porosity of soil aggregates. In the present study, three lithopedodomains which were assumed to be closely related to the dominant lithology of the soil parent material, varying in the degree of water erosion intensity, were selected for further analysis which focused mainly on the influence of iron oxide mineralogy on the soil aggregation. Powder X-ray diffractometry, 80 K Mossbauer data and SEM images are used to correlate all these variables with observed erosion activity in the field. The present data indicate that the more the soil is rich in iron (hematite and/or goethite) or aluminium (gibbsite) (hydr)oxide, the smaller are its aggregates and is porous. Soils derived from metabasic rocks are much more susceptible to collapse under wetting than those from other lithologies. They have the highest iron and clay content. Schist-derived soil is richer in muscovite, has bigger aggregates and porous and are less prone to collapse, while the granite-derived soil presents relatively intermediate resistance, when humid.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 184
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Manual de metodos de analises de solo
[2]   IRON-OXIDES AND PARTICLE AGGREGATION IN B-HORIZONS OF SOME ITALIAN SOILS [J].
ARDUINO, E ;
BARBERIS, E ;
BOERO, V .
GEODERMA, 1989, 45 (3-4) :319-329
[3]  
AUGUSTIN CHR, 1995, THESIS JW GOETHE U F
[4]   Gully processes and modelling [J].
Bull, LJ ;
Kirkby, MJ .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (03) :354-374
[5]  
Coey J. M. D., 1992, Revista de Fisica Aplicada e Instrumentacao, V7, P25
[6]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AGGREGATION AND IRON-OXIDES IN TERRA ROSSA SOILS FROM SOUTHERN ITALY [J].
COLOMBO, C ;
TORRENT, J .
CATENA, 1991, 18 (01) :51-59
[7]   Magnetic soils from mafic lithodomains in Brazil [J].
Fabris, JD ;
Coey, JMD ;
Mussel, WD .
HYPERFINE INTERACTIONS, 1998, 113 (1-4) :249-258
[8]  
Jackson M.L., 1969, SOIL CHEM ANAL ADV C, P894
[9]  
RESENDE M, 1990, P S MAN CONS SOL NO, P32
[10]  
ROSENDE M, 1985, INFORME AGROPECUARIO, V11, P3