Unenhanced CT for the detection of renal cell carcinoma: effect of tumor size and contour type

被引:4
作者
Jung, Sung Il [1 ]
Park, Hee Sun [1 ]
Kim, Young Jun [1 ]
Jeon, Hae Jeong [1 ]
机构
[1] Konkuk Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Res Inst Med Sci, Seoul 143729, South Korea
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2014年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Unenhanced CT; Detection; ACUTE FLANK PAIN; HELICAL CT; COLONOGRAPHY; FEATURES; MASSES; APPENDICITIS; TOMOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; AGREEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-013-0068-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate effect of tumor size and contour type for the detection of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on unenhanced CT. This retrospective institutional review board approved study that includes 111 patients with RCC and 100 patients without RCC who underwent unenhanced CT. Two readers performed a blinded and independent review of the presence of RCC on unenhanced CT. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was compared by tumor size (< 3 cm: small, or a parts per thousand yen3 cm: large) and contour type (endophytic, mesophytic, or exophytic). For tumor size, the AUC for small RCC (0.70 and 0.78, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for large RCC (0.97 and 0.99, for reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). As for contour type of tumor, the AUC for endophytic RCC (0.60 and 0.71, for reader 1 and reader 2) was significantly lower than that for mesophytic RCC (0.95 and 0.98, for reader 1 and reader 2) and exophytic RCC (0.98 and 0.99, reader 1 and reader 2) (p < 0.001). On unenhanced CT, tumor size and contour type can affect the detection of RCC. While most large or exophytic RCC can be easily detected, the detection of small and endophytic RCC is highly limited.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 357
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging
    Barrett, Tyler W.
    Schierling, Michelle
    Zhou, Chuan
    Colfax, J. Drew
    Russ, Stephan
    Conatser, Paige
    Lancaster, Penny
    Wrenn, Keith
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 27 (04) : 428 - 435
  • [2] Catalano Orlando, 2002, Emerg Radiol, V9, P146
  • [4] Alternate or additional findings to stone disease on unenhanced computerized tomography for acute flank pain can impact management
    Hoppe, H
    Studer, R
    Kessler, TM
    Vock, P
    Studer, UE
    Thoeny, HC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (05) : 1725 - 1730
  • [5] Small (<=3-cm) renal masses: Detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation
    JamisDow, CA
    Choyke, PL
    Jennings, SB
    Linehan, WM
    Thakore, KN
    Walther, MM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) : 785 - 788
  • [6] Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma
    Jayson, M
    Sanders, H
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (02) : 203 - 205
  • [7] CT colonography: The next colon screening examination?
    Johnson, CD
    Dachman, AH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) : 331 - 341
  • [8] Can high-attenuation renal cysts be differentiated from renal cell carcinoma at unenhanced CT?
    Jonisch, Ari I.
    Rubinowitz, Ami N.
    Mutalik, Pradeep G.
    Israel, Gary M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (02) : 445 - 450
  • [9] Suspected appendicitis in children:: Diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced helical CT
    Kaiser, S
    Finnbogason, T
    Jorulf, HK
    Söderman, E
    Frenckner, B
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) : 427 - 433
  • [10] Unenhanced CT of abdominal and pelvic hemorrhage
    Katz, DS
    Lane, MJ
    Mindelzun, RE
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1999, 20 (02) : 94 - 107