Ten recommendations for assessing the comparative effectiveness of therapeutic medical devices: a targeted review and adaptation

被引:9
作者
Schnell-Inderst, Petra [1 ]
Hunger, Theresa [1 ]
Conrads-Frank, Annette [1 ]
Arvandi, Marjan [1 ]
Siebert, Uwe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Inst Publ Hlth Med Decis Making & Hlth Technol As, Dept Publ Hlth Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Asses, UMIT,Eduard Wallnoefer Ctr 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[2] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Inst Technol Assessment, 101 Merrimac St,STE 1010, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 101 Merrimac St,STE 1010, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Medical devices; Implants; Comparative effectiveness; Health technology assessment; Recommendations; Methodology; BARE-METAL STENTS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS; ELUTING STENTS; BIAS; METAANALYSIS; MODELS; DRUGS; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to review existing guidance on the methods for evaluation of the comparative effectiveness (CE) of therapeutic medical devices (TMDs) and develop recommendations for systematic reviews (SRs) of CE of TMDs as part of health technology assessments. Study Design and Setting: We performed a targeted literature review of evaluation frameworks and recommendations for evaluation methods for TMDs and related technologies. An electronic database search was combined with systematic screening of tables of content of selected journals and scanning the reference lists of relevant papers. Results: We identified a framework for SRs of complex interventions (FSRCIs) and three documents providing detailed methodology for TMD evaluation. We applied the FSRCIs to TMD evaluation taking into account the more complex composition of the intervention, its rapid, incremental development, as well as the dependency of treatment effects on contextual factors and user proficiency. In 10 recommendations, including a template for a logic model for TMD, we summarized relevant factors that should be systematically considered. Conclusion: The quality of SRs of CE assessments of TMDs can be improved by applying these recommendations. This also may require an increase of the quality of primary studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 113
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Investigating complexity in systematic reviews of interventions by using a spectrum of methods
    Anderson, Laurie M.
    Oliver, Sandy R.
    Michie, Susan
    Rehfuess, Eva
    Noyes, Jane
    Shemilt, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1223 - 1229
  • [2] Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering complexity in systematic reviews of interventions
    Anderson, Laurie M.
    Petticrew, Mark
    Chandler, Jackie
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Tugwell, Peter
    O'Neill, Jennifer
    Welch, Vivian
    Squires, Janet
    Churchill, Rachel
    Shemilt, Ian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1205 - 1208
  • [3] Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews
    Anderson, Laurie M.
    Petticrew, Mark
    Rehfuess, Eva
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Ueffing, Erin
    Baker, Phillip
    Francis, Daniel
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2011, 2 (01) : 33 - 42
  • [4] [Anonymous], SYST REV CRDS GUID U
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
  • [6] Best N, 2005, P 3 ASC INT C SURV R
  • [7] Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO META ANAL STAT
  • [8] Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making
    Burford, Belinda
    Lewin, Simon
    Welch, Vivian
    Rehfuess, Eva
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (11) : 1251 - 1261
  • [9] Ciani O, 2016, HEALTH ECON, V26, P13
  • [10] HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES: A SURVEY OF NON-EUROPEAN UNION AGENCIES
    Ciani, Oriana
    Wilcher, Britni
    Blankart, Carl Rudolf
    Hatz, Maximilian
    Rupel, Valentina Prevolnik
    Erker, Renata Slabe
    Varabyova, Yauheniya
    Taylor, Rod S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2015, 31 (03) : 154 - 165