Failure After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Antibiotics in the Cement Spacer

被引:22
|
作者
Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan [1 ]
Kheir, Michael M. [2 ]
Moya, Ignacio [3 ]
Rondon, Alexander J. [2 ]
Kheir, Matthew [2 ]
Lozano, Luis [3 ]
Parvizi, Javad [2 ]
Soriano, Alex [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Prevent, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Rothman Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Barcelona, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Serv Infect Dis, Hosp Clin, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
2-stage exchange; prosthetic joint infection; reimplantation; antibiotic cement spacer; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION; REIMPLANTATION; HIP; PROPHYLAXIS; RESISTANCE; MICROBIOLOGY; PREDICTORS; SONICATION; CULTURES;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciy851
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Failure after a 2-stage exchange surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is high. Previous studies demonstrated that positive cultures at reimplantation are associated with failure afterward. The aim of this multicenter study was to define the role of antibiotics in the cement spacer in relation to reimplantation cultures and subsequent failure. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 2-stage exchange procedures between 2000 and 2015. Culture-negative PJIs, cases in which no cultures were obtained during reimplantation, and cases without data on cement spacers were excluded. Results. Three hundred forty-four cases were included. The rate of positive cultures during reimplantation was 9.5% for cement spacers containing a glycopeptide (27/284) (with or without an aminoglycoside) vs 21.7% for those containing monotherapy with an aminoglycoside (13/60) (P = .008), and was mostly attributed by a reduction in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (17% vs 2%, P < .001). The failure rate was >2-fold higher at 40.0% (16/40) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 15.8% (48/304) for those with negative cultures (P < .001). Overall, a glycopeptide in the cement spacer was not associated with a lower failure rate (18% vs 23%, P = .3), but was associated with lower failure due to CoNS (2.5% vs 13.3%, P < .001). Conclusions. In a 2-stage exchange procedure for PJI, adding a glycopeptide to the cement spacer reduces the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation and is associated with a lower failure rate due to CoNS afterward.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2093
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence of the Type of Bone Cement Used in Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Chronic Periarticular Joint Infection on the Spacer Replacement and Reinfection Rate
    Chang, Meng-Wei
    Wu, Cheng-Ta
    Yen, Shih-Hsiang
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Lin, Po-Chun
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (02)
  • [42] Success Rate After 2-Stage Spacer-Free Total Hip Arthroplasty Exchange and Risk Factors for Reinfection: A Prospective Cohort Study of 187 Patients
    Goumenos, Stavros
    Hardt, Sebastian
    Kontogeorgakos, Vasileios
    Trampuz, Andrej
    Perka, Carsten
    Meller, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (10) : 2600 - 2606
  • [43] One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Fistulizing Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: An Effective Strategy
    Marmor, Simon
    Kerroumi, Younes
    Meyssonnier, Vanina
    Lhotellier, Luc
    Mouton, Antoine
    Graff, Wilfrid
    Zeller, Valerie
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [44] Change in organism between first- and second-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of knee arthroplasty independently associated with increased risk of failure
    Walker, L. C.
    Clement, N. D.
    Yapp, L. Z.
    Deehan, D. J.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2023, 4 (09): : 720 - 727
  • [45] Two stage revision hip arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection. Comparison study: with or without the use of a spacer
    Dariusz Marczak
    Marek Synder
    Marcin Sibiński
    Michał Polguj
    Julian Dudka
    Jacek Kowalczewski
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 2253 - 2258
  • [46] Two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection in cemented total hip arthroplasty: an increased risk for failure?
    Hipfl, Christian
    Leopold, Vincent
    Becker, Luis
    Pumberger, Matthias
    Perka, Carsten
    Hardt, Sebastian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (07) : 4481 - 4490
  • [47] Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients Who Have Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty as Well as Their Fate
    Chen, Yi-Chen
    Lin, Yu-Chih
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Lee, Sheng-Hsun
    Chang, Yuhan
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (02) : 355 - 360
  • [48] Survival and Outcomes of 1.5-Stage vs 2-Stage Exchange Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Prosthetic Joint Infection
    Nabet, Austin
    Sax, Oliver C.
    Shanoada, Roni
    Conway, Janet D.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    Nace, James
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (05) : 936 - 941
  • [49] Is There a Role for Extended Postoperative Oral Antibiotics in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty High-Risk Individuals After Surgery for Periprosthetic Joint Infection?
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08) : 1441 - 1442
  • [50] Patient-Related Predictors of Treatment Failure After Two-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bhanushali, Ameya
    Tran, Liem
    Nairne-Nagy, Jaiden
    Bereza, Samuel
    Callary, Stuart A.
    Atkins, Gerald J.
    Ramasamy, Boopalan
    Solomon, Lucian B.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (09) : 2395 - 2402.e14