Failure After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Antibiotics in the Cement Spacer

被引:22
|
作者
Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan [1 ]
Kheir, Michael M. [2 ]
Moya, Ignacio [3 ]
Rondon, Alexander J. [2 ]
Kheir, Matthew [2 ]
Lozano, Luis [3 ]
Parvizi, Javad [2 ]
Soriano, Alex [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Med Microbiol & Infect Prevent, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Rothman Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Barcelona, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Barcelona, Serv Infect Dis, Hosp Clin, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
2-stage exchange; prosthetic joint infection; reimplantation; antibiotic cement spacer; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION; REIMPLANTATION; HIP; PROPHYLAXIS; RESISTANCE; MICROBIOLOGY; PREDICTORS; SONICATION; CULTURES;
D O I
10.1093/cid/ciy851
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Failure after a 2-stage exchange surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is high. Previous studies demonstrated that positive cultures at reimplantation are associated with failure afterward. The aim of this multicenter study was to define the role of antibiotics in the cement spacer in relation to reimplantation cultures and subsequent failure. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 2-stage exchange procedures between 2000 and 2015. Culture-negative PJIs, cases in which no cultures were obtained during reimplantation, and cases without data on cement spacers were excluded. Results. Three hundred forty-four cases were included. The rate of positive cultures during reimplantation was 9.5% for cement spacers containing a glycopeptide (27/284) (with or without an aminoglycoside) vs 21.7% for those containing monotherapy with an aminoglycoside (13/60) (P = .008), and was mostly attributed by a reduction in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (17% vs 2%, P < .001). The failure rate was >2-fold higher at 40.0% (16/40) in cases with positive cultures at reimplantation compared to 15.8% (48/304) for those with negative cultures (P < .001). Overall, a glycopeptide in the cement spacer was not associated with a lower failure rate (18% vs 23%, P = .3), but was associated with lower failure due to CoNS (2.5% vs 13.3%, P < .001). Conclusions. In a 2-stage exchange procedure for PJI, adding a glycopeptide to the cement spacer reduces the rate of positive cultures during reimplantation and is associated with a lower failure rate due to CoNS afterward.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2093
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost Drivers in Two-Stage Treatment of Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection With an Antibiotic Coated Cement Hip Spacer
    Charalambous, Lefko T.
    Wixted, Colleen M.
    Kim, Billy I.
    Cochrane, Niall H.
    Belay, Elshaday S.
    Joseph, Hayden L.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (01) : 6 - 12
  • [22] Risk Factors for Failure After 1-Stage Exchange Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Citak, Mustafa
    Friedenstab, Jasmin
    Abdelaziz, Hussein
    Suero, Eduardo M.
    Zahar, Akos
    Salber, Jochen
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (12) : 1061 - 1069
  • [23] Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty Is a Favorable Treatment Option Upon Diagnosis of a Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    Goswami, Karan
    Shohat, Noam
    Blevins, Kier
    Rondon, Alexander J.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (11) : 3555 - 3560
  • [24] Effect of Antibiotic Spacer Dosing on Treatment Success in Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Warwick, Hunter S.
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Rangwalla, Khuzaima
    Shau, David N.
    Barry, Jeffrey J.
    Hansen, Erik N.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024, 8 (02):
  • [25] Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Rate and Reason for the Attrition After the First Stage
    Wang, Qiaojie
    Goswami, Karan
    Kuo, Feng-Chih
    Xu, Chi
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Parvizi, Javad
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (11) : 2749 - 2756
  • [26] Risk factors of reinfection after prosthesis removal and antibiotic bone cement spacer implantation for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection
    Wang, Qingkai
    Huang, Jincheng
    Chen, Xiao
    Jin, Yi
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy of antifungal-impregnated cement spacer against chronic fungal periprosthetic joint infections after total knee arthroplasty
    Kim, Jong-Keun
    Lee, Do-Yoon
    Kang, Dong-Wan
    Ro, Du-Hyun
    Lee, Myung Chul
    Han, Hyuk-Soo
    KNEE, 2018, 25 (04) : 631 - 637
  • [28] Evidence of MRSE on a gentamicin and vancomycin impregnated polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement spacer after two-stage exchange arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection of the knee
    Schmolders, Jan
    Hischebeth, Gunnar T. R.
    Friedrich, Max J.
    Randau, Thomas M.
    Wimmer, Matthias D.
    Kohlhof, Hendrik
    Molitor, Ernst
    Gravius, Sascha
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [29] Complications and Outcomes Associated With a Novel, Prefabricated, Articulating Spacer for Two-Stage Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment
    Buller, Leonard T.
    Ziemba-Davis, Mary
    Meneghini, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (12) : 3979 - 3985
  • [30] Two stage revision hip arthroplasty in periprosthetic joint infection. Comparison study: with or without the use of a spacer
    Marczak, Dariusz
    Synder, Marek
    Sibinski, Marcin
    Polguj, Michal
    Dudka, Julian
    Kowalczewski, Jacek
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (11) : 2253 - 2258