Relative United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Performance by Specialty Is Not a Predictor of Board Exam Pass Rate: The Case of Diagnostic Radiology

被引:0
作者
Sakya, Surav M. [1 ]
Dinh, Mary L. [1 ]
Chan, Donald [2 ]
Pfeifer, Cory M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Coll Med, Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Riverside Community Hosp, Internal Med, Riverside, CA USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Radiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
usmle; diagnostic radiology; board exam; residency education; AMERICAN BOARD; CERTIFICATION; REQUIREMENTS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.12725
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In 2010 diagnostic radiology (DR) changed the board certification process for residents using the new Core exam. However, there is not a standardized way to evaluate DR residency graduates. With no specific target pass rate for the exam, the "appropriate" pass rate has remained a debated topic among the field. In this paper, the board certification exam passage rates of DR are compared to other medical specialties to assess the standardization method of the American Board of Radiology (ABR) and serve as basis for additional specialties considering changes to their board exam structure. Methods Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was obtained from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) and San Francisco match. Boards passage rates were analyzed using data from the American Board of Medical Specialties. USMLE and board exam passage rates were averaged and ranked, and statistical analysis was conducted using Stata (College Station, TX). Results DR performance on USMLE Step 1 has increased at the lowest rate (0.563 points/year) since 2005 and anesthesiology performance has increased at the greatest rate (1.313 points/year). Residents matching from US allopathic medical schools during the 2010 and 2012 years had DR oral board exams with USMLE 1 averages of 232 and 235, respectively. First-time pass rate for the first Core exam was 87% and the overall pass rate since the first Core exam has been 88.54%. The Spearman rho coefficient for specialty ranks of board passage rate and USMLE 1 was 0.0679 (p = 0.8101). The Spearman rho coefficient for board passage rate and USMLE 2 CK was 0.1430 (p = 0.6257). The Spearman rho coefficient for USMLE 1 and USMLE 2 CK was 0.8317 (p = 0.0002). Conclusions Specialty board pass rates have not increased in concert with improved trainee performance on the USMLE. USMLE performance among those matching in diagnostic radiology has increased, ABR board exam passage rate has decreased. ABR determines passing thresholds to the relative performance of examinees rather than using a criterion referenced Angoff standard.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The new requirements and testing for American board of radiology certification in diagnostic radiology [J].
Alderson, Philip O. ;
Becker, Gary J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) :707-709
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OPHTH RES MATCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], Data and Results: National Enforcement Trends
[4]   ABR Examinations: The Why, What, and How [J].
Becker, Gary J. ;
Bosma, Jennifer L. ;
Guiberteau, Milton J. ;
Gerdeman, Anthony M. ;
Frush, Donald P. ;
Borgstede, James P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02) :237-245
[5]   The ABR "Recalls" Conundrum: An Ethical Quandary [J].
Berlin, Leonard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (06) :380-383
[6]   The new requirements and testing for American board of radiology certification: A contrary opinion [J].
Hall, Ferris M. ;
Janower, Murray L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 248 (03) :710-712
[7]   Results of the 2015 Survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology [J].
Hammer, Mark M. ;
Shetty, Anup S. ;
Cizman, Ziga ;
McWilliams, Sebastian R. ;
Holt, Daniel K. ;
Gould, Jennifer E. ;
Evens, Ronald G. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (10) :1308-1316
[8]  
National Resident Matching Program, 2012, NAT RES MATCH PROGR
[9]  
National Resident Matching Program, 2018, NAT RES MATCH PROGR
[10]  
National Resident Matching Program, 2009, NAT RES MATCH PROGR