Should single-stage PEG buttons become the procedure of choice for PEG placement in children?

被引:15
作者
Evans, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Thorne, Margaret [1 ]
Taufiq, Salik [1 ]
George, Donald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nemours Childrens Clin, Div Pediat Gastroenterol & Nutr, Jacksonville, FL 32207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2006.04.042
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Single-stage PEG buttons (PEG-B) allow initial placement of a skin-level gastrostomy device for children who require enteral access. They offer significant advantages over traditionally placed PEG tubes (PEG-T) but have not been widely accepted into practice. Objective: To review our experience with PEG-Bs compared with PEG-Ts. Hypothesis: PEG-B shares a similar safety profile with PEG-T but delays the need for an initial device change well beyond the change that usually occurs at 6 to 8 weeks after PEG-T placement. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: All children undergoing both PEG procedures and attending our clinic from 1997 to 2002. Main Outcome Measurements: Age, sex, weight, indications, postoperative complications, interval until first tube change and first tube change complications. Results: Totals of 145 and 93 patients were identified in the PEG-B and PEG-T groups, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar in the 2 groups with respect to age, weight, indications, and postoperative complications. The interval until first tube change, however, was significantly longer in the PEG-B group (314 days) than in the PEG-T (78 days) (P < .0001). In addition, the PEG-B was found to be as safe as the PEG-T for small infants who weighed less than 5 kg. Conclusions: PEG-B placement should be considered as the procedure of choice over PEG-T placement for children. It offers similar safety profiles, even for small patients and a significantly longer interval until first device change.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 324
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   GASTROSTOMY WITHOUT LAPAROTOMY - A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC TECHNIQUE [J].
GAUDERER, MWL ;
PONSKY, JL ;
IZANT, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1980, 15 (06) :872-875
[2]  
GEORGE DE, 2002, TECH GASTROINTEST EN, V4, P201
[3]   Single-stage percutaneous gastrostomy button insertion: A leap forward [J].
Griffiths, M .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1996, 20 (03) :237-239
[4]   Primary percutaneous endoscopic button gastrostomy: A modification of the "push" technique [J].
Kiser, AC ;
Inglis, G ;
Nakayama, DK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (06) :704-706
[5]  
Kozarek RA, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P629
[6]   ONE-STAGE GASTROSTOMY BUTTON - AN ASSESSMENT [J].
MARION, MT ;
ZWENG, TN ;
STRODEL, WE .
ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (08) :666-670
[7]  
Ruangtrakool Ravit, 2000, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V83, P839
[8]   PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC PLACEMENT OF THE BUTTON GASTROSTOMY TUBE AS THE INITIAL PROCEDURE IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN [J].
TREEM, WR ;
ETIENNE, NL ;
HYAMS, JS .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1993, 17 (04) :382-386
[9]   Prospective trial evaluating early initiation of feeding in patients with newly placed one-step button gastrostomy devices [J].
Yarze, JC ;
Herlihy, KJ ;
Fritz, HP ;
Bolton, CH ;
Schupp, SL ;
Brooks, RL ;
Butler, J ;
Tata, JA ;
Dimick, RN .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2001, 46 (04) :854-858