Quality and Safety Indicators in Anesthesia A Systematic Review

被引:93
作者
Haller, Guy [1 ]
Stoelwinder, Johannes
Myles, Paul S. [3 ,4 ]
McNeil, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Anesthesia Pharmacol & Intens Care, Div Clin Epidemiol, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council Ctr Clin Res Excellen, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Alfred Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Anesthesia, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; ADVERSE EVENTS; PATIENT-SAFETY; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; CLINICAL INDICATORS; MEDICAL-PRACTICE; RISK SCORE; OF-CARE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a1093b
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Clinical indicators are increasingly developed and promoted by professional organizations, governmental agencies, and quality initiatives as measures of quality and performance. To clarify the number, characteristics, and validity of indicators available for anesthesia care, the authors performed a systematic review. They identified 108 anesthetic clinical indicators, of which 53 related also to surgical or postoperative ward care. Most were process (42%) or outcome (57%) measures assessing the safety and effectiveness of patient care. To identify possible quality issues, most clinical indicators were used as part of interhospital comparison or professional peer-review processes. For 60% of the clinical indicators identified, validity relied on expert opinion. The level of scientific evidence on which prescriptive indicators ("how things should be done") were based was high (1a-1b) for 38% and low (4-5) for 62% of indicators. Additional efforts should be placed into the development and validation of anesthesia-specific quality indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1175
页数:18
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
*AG HEALTHC RES QU, 2001, AHRQ PUBL, P214
[2]   Injuries associated with anaesthesia. A global perspective [J].
Aitkenhead, AR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (01) :95-109
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[4]   A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Korttila, K ;
Abdalla, M ;
Kerger, H ;
Turan, A ;
Vedder, I ;
Zernak, C ;
Danner, K ;
Jokela, R ;
Pocock, SJ ;
Trenkler, S ;
Kredel, M ;
Biedler, A ;
Sessler, DI ;
Roewer, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (24) :2441-2451
[5]   A risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in adults [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Greim, CA ;
Haubitz, I ;
Goepfert, C ;
Usadel, J ;
Sefrin, P ;
Roewer, N .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 42 (05) :495-501
[6]   How safe is the safety paradigm? [J].
Arah, OA ;
Klazinga, NS .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (03) :226-232
[7]   Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire [J].
Auquier, P ;
Pernoud, N ;
Bruder, N ;
Simeoni, MC ;
Auffray, JP ;
Colavolpe, C ;
François, G ;
Gouin, F ;
Manelli, JC ;
Martin, C ;
Sapin, C ;
Blache, JL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 102 (06) :1116-1123
[8]  
*AUSTR COUNC HEALT, 1997, CLIN IND US MAN VERS, P3
[9]  
*AUSTR COUNC HEALT, 2007, AUSTR CLIN IND REP 1, P56
[10]   Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines:: A systematic review [J].
Bahtsevani, C ;
Udén, G ;
Willman, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (04) :427-433