Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center, Real-Life Experience

被引:32
|
作者
Ghirardi, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Ronsini, Carlo [3 ]
Trozzi, Rita [1 ,2 ]
Di Ilio, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Di Giorgio, Andrea [4 ]
Cianci, Stefano [5 ]
Draisci, Gaetano [2 ,6 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Fagotti, Anna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Salute Donna & Bambino & Salute Pubb, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
[3] Gabriele DAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santissima Annunziata Hosp, Chieti, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Div Peritoneal & Retroperitoneal Surg, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gen & Specialized Surg Women & Children, Naples, Italy
[6] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Emergency Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Rome, Italy
关键词
complications; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); interval debulking surgery; morbidity; ovarian cancer; HIPEC; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.33167
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An improvement in survival without increasing perioperative morbidity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been recently demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial. This study was aimed at assessing the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of the use of HIPEC after IDS at a referral cancer center. METHODS: Over the study period,149 IDSs were performed. Patients who had at least International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III disease, with <2.5 mm of residual disease (RD) at the end of surgery and were not participating in clinical trials received HIPEC. Moreover, specific exclusion criteria were considered. These patients were compared with 51 patients with similar clinical characteristics at the same institution and within the same timeframe who did not receive HIPEC. RESULTS: No differences in patient or disease characteristics with the exception of the type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .002) were found between the 2 groups. As for surgical characteristics, significant differences were found in RD after IDS (P = .007) and in the duration of surgery (P < .001), whereas the bowel resection and diversion rates (P = .583 and P= .213, respectively) and the postoperative intensive care unit and hospital stays (P = .567 and P= .727, respectively) were comparable. The times to start adjuvant chemotherapy were also similar (P = .998). Equally. the rates of any grade of both intraoperative complications (P = .189) and early postoperative complications (P = .238) were superimposable. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' experience, the addition of HIPEC to IDS is feasible in 35% for the population. This value might increase with changes in the inclusion/exclusion criteria. HIPEC does not increase perioperative complications and does not affect a patient's recovery or time to start adjuvant chemotherapy. HIPEC should be offered to select patients listed for IDS. (C) 2020 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5256 / 5262
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cytoreduction Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center Cohort Study
    Framarini, Massimo
    D'Acapito, Fabrizio
    Di Pietrantonio, Daniela
    Tauceri, Francesca
    Di Lorenzo, Paolo
    Solaini, Leonardo
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 590 - 599
  • [22] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (01):
  • [23] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    Bryant, Andrew
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):
  • [24] Interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Laopaiboon, Malinee
    Lumbiganon, Pisake
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (01):
  • [25] Primary Versus Interval Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Results From a Systematic Single-Center Analysis
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Savvatis, Konstantinos
    Braicu, Elena-Ioana
    Schmidt, Sven-Christian
    Lichtenegger, Werner
    Fotopoulou, Christina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (08) : 1331 - 1340
  • [26] Role of surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
    Kim, S., I
    Kim, J-W
    ESMO OPEN, 2021, 6 (03)
  • [27] Timing is everything: intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Jessica Lee
    John P. Curtin
    Franco M. Muggia
    Bhavana Pothuri
    Leslie R. Boyd
    Stephanie V. Blank
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2018, 82 : 55 - 63
  • [28] A Single-Center, Retrospective Study of Bevacizumab-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Interval Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer
    Park, Junsik
    Eoh, Kyung Jin
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Sang Wun
    Kim, Young Tae
    Lee, Jung-Yun
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (04) : 284 - 290
  • [29] Evaluating the Impact of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) on Interval and Secondary Debulking in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Tsolakidis, Dimitrios
    Kyziridis, Dimitrios
    Panoskaltsis, Theodoros
    Kalakonas, Apostolos
    Theodoulidis, Vasileios
    Chatzistamatiou, Kimon
    Zouzoulas, Dimitrios
    Tentes, Antonios-Apostolos
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [30] Prognostic factors and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer - A single tertiary institution experience
    Kocic, Milan
    Nikolic, Srdjan
    Zegarac, Milan
    Djurisic, Igor
    Soldatovic, Ivan
    Milenkovic, Petar
    Kocic, Jovana
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2016, 21 (05): : 1176 - 1183