Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Interval Debulking Surgery for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Center, Real-Life Experience

被引:34
作者
Ghirardi, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Ronsini, Carlo [3 ]
Trozzi, Rita [1 ,2 ]
Di Ilio, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Di Giorgio, Andrea [4 ]
Cianci, Stefano [5 ]
Draisci, Gaetano [2 ,6 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Fagotti, Anna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Salute Donna & Bambino & Salute Pubb, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
[3] Gabriele DAnnunzio Univ Chieti Pescara, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Santissima Annunziata Hosp, Chieti, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Div Peritoneal & Retroperitoneal Surg, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gen & Specialized Surg Women & Children, Naples, Italy
[6] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dept Emergency Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Rome, Italy
关键词
complications; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC); interval debulking surgery; morbidity; ovarian cancer; HIPEC; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.33167
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An improvement in survival without increasing perioperative morbidity in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after interval debulking surgery (IDS) has been recently demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial. This study was aimed at assessing the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of the use of HIPEC after IDS at a referral cancer center. METHODS: Over the study period,149 IDSs were performed. Patients who had at least International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III disease, with <2.5 mm of residual disease (RD) at the end of surgery and were not participating in clinical trials received HIPEC. Moreover, specific exclusion criteria were considered. These patients were compared with 51 patients with similar clinical characteristics at the same institution and within the same timeframe who did not receive HIPEC. RESULTS: No differences in patient or disease characteristics with the exception of the type of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .002) were found between the 2 groups. As for surgical characteristics, significant differences were found in RD after IDS (P = .007) and in the duration of surgery (P < .001), whereas the bowel resection and diversion rates (P = .583 and P= .213, respectively) and the postoperative intensive care unit and hospital stays (P = .567 and P= .727, respectively) were comparable. The times to start adjuvant chemotherapy were also similar (P = .998). Equally. the rates of any grade of both intraoperative complications (P = .189) and early postoperative complications (P = .238) were superimposable. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' experience, the addition of HIPEC to IDS is feasible in 35% for the population. This value might increase with changes in the inclusion/exclusion criteria. HIPEC does not increase perioperative complications and does not affect a patient's recovery or time to start adjuvant chemotherapy. HIPEC should be offered to select patients listed for IDS. (C) 2020 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5256 / 5262
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Aletti, Giovanni D. ;
Dowdy, Sean C. ;
Podratz, Karl C. ;
Cliby, William A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) :676.e1-676.e7
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMM TERM CRIT ADV E
[3]   Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Redefining 'optimal' residual disease [J].
Chang, Suk-Joon ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (02) :483-492
[4]   A critical appraisal of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer [J].
Chiva, Luis M. ;
Gonzalez-Martin, Antonio .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 136 (01) :130-135
[5]   Cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC repetition for secondary ovarian cancer recurrence [J].
Cianci, Stefano ;
Ronsini, Carlo ;
Vizzielli, Giuseppe ;
Tropea, Alessandro ;
Biondi, Antonio ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Fagotti, Anna .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (02) :389-394
[6]   Advances in ovarian cancer therapy [J].
Cortez, Alexander J. ;
Tudrej, Patrycja ;
Kujawa, Katarzyna A. ;
Lisowska, Katarzyna M. .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 81 (01) :17-38
[7]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[8]   Evaluation of a mature trauma system [J].
Durham, Rodney ;
Pracht, Etienne ;
Orban, Barbara ;
Lottenburg, Larry ;
Tepas, Joseph ;
Flint, Le-Wis .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (06) :775-785
[9]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[10]  
ESGO eAcademy, HIP INTR CHEM HIPEC